Stamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agonot hard rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square377fedilinkarrow-up1455arrow-down113
arrow-up1442arrow-down1imagenot hard rulelemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square377fedilink
minus-squareazolus@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-24 days agoLibertarian on its own means nothing. AnCaps are perfectly fine with a “tyranny of corporations” and are therefore not anti-authoritarian. The concept of private property necessitates an authority to enforce property rights.
minus-squareabbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 days agoThis ia the correct opinion. Have an upvote.
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 days agoTrue, but they’ll agree with the “legal \neq moral” statement regardless because they think it won’t bite at them.
Libertarian on its own means nothing. AnCaps are perfectly fine with a “tyranny of corporations” and are therefore not anti-authoritarian. The concept of private property necessitates an authority to enforce property rights.
This ia the correct opinion. Have an upvote.
True, but they’ll agree with the “legal \neq moral” statement regardless because they think it won’t bite at them.