LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoCan anyone confirm?piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square148fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageCan anyone confirm?piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square148fedilink
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day ago“Frantically”. Guys, stop adscribing human features to LLMs.
minus-squareNigelFrobisher@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 day agoI dunno, anything less would be greenwashing their profligate power consumption.
minus-squarejsomae@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 day agoYou sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 day agoWell given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoThere’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
“Frantically”. Guys, stop adscribing human features to LLMs.
I dunno, anything less would be greenwashing their profligate power consumption.
This again. sight
You sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
Well given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.
There’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
I’m sure OOP works for big AI.
big if true