• LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You seem to be projecting your ‘scream-cry’ onto me, when all I did was give you the statistics you asked for.

      I’ll not hold your hand when you can’t click links and read, and I’ll not entertain your childish soliloquies.

      Type another inane dissertation all you like – I didn’t sign up here to be an elementary school teacher.

      • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        22 hours ago

        You read the comment thread in which someone else posted links, but not my response to that… Superb

        Yea, dismiss my argument and do pretend that you didn’t read the exerts from the bbc article that delved into his presumed beliefs! Kinda happy you fuck off, you have nothing to contribute

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Sigh. My comment, my links.

          Here, I’ll post it again, since you seem to be a bit in need of coffee or something:

          Yes, statistically.

          Based on government and independent analyses, right-wing extremist violence has been responsible for the overwhelming majority of fatalities, amounting to approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001.

          Want to claim the government and independent studies are fake again?

          • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            22 hours ago

            You think I am going to memorize usernames? And why aren’t you responding to my question that I posed to your brilliant argument? Why don’t you think that black people committed this crime? They are statistically more likely to do so

            Also, aren’t you the pup who claimed the one source I have been posting again and agaon is not from the bbc…? You are! Who is having issues opening and reading links?

            • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Because I spent the time to give you actual information and you’ve ignored it. I had enough respect to at least notice who I was talking to – I’m sorry you didn’t have the same courtesy. I didn’t even downvote you, though you’ve downvoted me.

              Why should I respect your time and comments when you’ve proven you don’t respect mine?

              eta: and where did I claim your source wasn’t from the BBC? I said it was irrelevant and wasn’t the link we were talking about at the time. You’re clearly not listening at all.

              In fact, I’ve wasted too much time with you already. Don’t bother replying. Or if you do, enjoy shouting into the void.

              • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                18
                ·
                22 hours ago

                I have responded to your source every time, its you still refuse to amswer the one question that point out how sad your argument is

                By far the saddest dismissal of an argument I have seen today is that I didn’t memorize your argument… Maybe if you stayed in 1 comment strand then I wouldn’t have an issue by telling you apart from the multiple arguments I am having on multiple platforms with multiple people on each! Welp, not that you had anything to add