ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-23 months agoPOV: You're a programmerlemmy.worldimagemessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1214arrow-down14
arrow-up1210arrow-down1imagePOV: You're a programmerlemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-23 months agomessage-square79fedilink
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoserde has entered the chat
minus-squarebalsoft@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoPersonally I’m more partial to nom. Serde is quite verbose and complex for a parser.
minus-squarefuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoFrom Scratch (as much as I like Rust, it’s very likely more verbose from scratch). Haskell is perfect for these kinds of things.
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-23 months agoI will concede that implementing the first version in Haskell would be better. Mostly so that we can then fulfil the meme of reimplementing it in Rust!
serde has entered the chat
Personally I’m more partial to nom. Serde is quite verbose and complex for a parser.
From Scratch (as much as I like Rust, it’s very likely more verbose from scratch). Haskell is perfect for these kinds of things.
I will concede that implementing the first version in Haskell would be better.
Mostly so that we can then fulfil the meme of reimplementing it in Rust!