ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-219 days agoPOV: You're a programmerlemmy.worldimagemessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1214arrow-down14
arrow-up1210arrow-down1imagePOV: You're a programmerlemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-219 days agomessage-square79fedilink
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·19 days agoserde has entered the chat
minus-squarebalsoft@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·18 days agoPersonally I’m more partial to nom. Serde is quite verbose and complex for a parser.
minus-squarefuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 days agoFrom Scratch (as much as I like Rust, it’s very likely more verbose from scratch). Haskell is perfect for these kinds of things.
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-213 days agoI will concede that implementing the first version in Haskell would be better. Mostly so that we can then fulfil the meme of reimplementing it in Rust!
serde has entered the chat
Personally I’m more partial to nom. Serde is quite verbose and complex for a parser.
From Scratch (as much as I like Rust, it’s very likely more verbose from scratch). Haskell is perfect for these kinds of things.
I will concede that implementing the first version in Haskell would be better.
Mostly so that we can then fulfil the meme of reimplementing it in Rust!