Yesterday I saw someone with Meta smart glasses in public for the first time. Even just standing near him was unpleasant. It doesn’t matter whether it’s recording, pointing a camera and mics at somebody who didn’t agree to it feels rude and a bit shocking.

I worry that this is becoming more acceptable or do others feel the same way? Companies keep pushing forward, now with smart neckleses, smart headphones, (all equipped with camera and mic). Are these all doomed to fail? What feature would convince me or others to actually start using them? It’s certainly not chatgpt strapped on your face, or a shitty quality spy camera either.

If any of my friends or family wore these, I wouldn’t feel comfortable speaking to them.

Im interested in your experiences. Thanks for reading.

  • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    There should be a law brought in so that any glasses fitted with cameras/microphones have to be clearly labeled (as in etched so it cant be removed) with a warning along the front face of the glasses and also make it to they can only be bright obnoxious high visibility colours like neon green/orange.

    Lets see how “fashionable” they are when they make you look like a member of LMFAO.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The meta glasses supposedly are designed with a bright led on the front that comes on when the camera or microphone is recording.

      Edit: I had forgotten when I wrote this that there are companies already offering services where you can send in your meta glasses and they claim they will somehow disable/bypass the LED indicator.

      • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah and people put little pieces of black tape over it that blends in with the black sunglasses and render that LED meaningless.

        • utopiah@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t think that works anymore because I believe the LED is also a sensor that when covered (no light in) prevents recording.

          • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            And that doesn’t work because you can place your hand over the camera which will trick the glasses into thinking you are in the dark which will allow you to start recording, then you just take your hand away.

            Youtube is full of videos that show people how to circumvent the LED on the these glasses. Its not rocket science.

            • utopiah@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’m not saying that it’s not feasible, I’m saying the hardware changed since those first “hacks”.

              Are you saying you tried on the latest version and covering the light sensor within the LED allow recording?

              Because my best is that the videos are showcasing this on older models which precisely did not included that sensor. Here is a 404 episode on that https://www.404media.co/how-to-disable-meta-rayban-led-light/

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Depends entirely on the implementation. If it’s wired right into the power line for the camera/mic, then it comes on when power goes to that hardware, but without extra engineering you could just pull off the LED and solder over the gap in the trace/wire.

          And I have to apologize, I had forgotten that there are already third party companies advertising services to bypass/disable it on the meta glasses. Have to edit my last comment.

  • James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    I recently asked a friend to remove their meta glasses while we were out to eat. It was awkward for a moment but they were understanding, and we had a good talk about privacy and tech after.

  • ijustliketrains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    My first time seeing anything about the meta Rayban glasses was some guy sexually harassing my friend at work as a “prank video.” He used the glasses as a secret recording device then posted it on facebook.

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mean I get it. Weird to have a private company walking monitoring device that proudly does so so they can… Upload more to social media? It just sorta marks you as a hyper user and in the past we would have doubted those types even came outside.
    Like I would pair it with the people who have only clothes and decorated with souvenir items from some random brand. It IS a weird look.

    But unfortunately Flock exists and they are everywhere, spun up in seconds with cameras just running light and are even easily hacked. So like privacy wise its less a concern but personally… Definitely not a fan and I get uncomfortable around them. I don’t want to be used for content or actively sold by you just for being near.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      One project that can help with this is the OUI-SPY, a small piece of open source hardware. The OUI-SPY runs on a cheap Arduino compatible chip called an ESP-32. There are multiple programs available for loading on the chip, such as “Flock You,” which allows people to detect Flock cameras and “Sky-Spy” to detect overhead drones. There’s also “BLE Detect,” which detects various Bluetooth signals including ones from Axon, Meta’s Ray-Bans that secretly record you, and more. It also has a mode commonly known as “fox hunting” to track down a specific device.

      https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/01/how-hackers-are-fighting-back-against-ice

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I worry you might not have a representative audience here, as most of Lemmy is privacy-savvy. I guess most people just don’t care, and if it keeps this way, it will be no different than smartphones (which are primarily spy devices most people carry around all the time and no one notices anymore).

  • ZiggyTheZygote@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I would get a very powerful magnet and ruin their devices. That works right? Otherwise I’ll get a device that scrambles smart devices. Fuck Zuckerberg.

      • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you hit the glasses hard enough it will to the job as good as a hammer… failing that it takes a tad too much power for a « magnet » to affect electronics at a distance.

      • ZiggyTheZygote@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        😄 I’m a millennial so back in the day we learned that magnets ruin some electronics, but things might have changed now. So we need a knowledgeable tech person to let us know.

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Magnets mostly messed with tapes, floppies and hard disks. I believe you could also mess up a CRT’s calibration with one.

          None of those technologies are particularly commonplace these days, especially not in those glasses.

          I mean an MRI level magnet could crush them, but you’re gonna struggle to move that around

  • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The law should be that the recording can only be used in private, by the owner of the device, not a company. If anyone shares the imagery or steals it, they should be subject to some kind of day-fine.

    That would be nice.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      That presumes the law works for you.

      The police state loves that they can just buy the data the big tech companies are happily farming. No warrants, no judges, no pesky civil rights to get in the way. Just full time monitoring.

  • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I feel the same way about smartphones but it’s now completely normalised. Glasses are less paranoia-inducing since you can clearly see where it’s pointed and it’s at eye-level. I’d rather discourage smartphone use than smart-glasses use.

    • rcbrk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      LoL @ the downvotes. Step one is acknowledging one’s addiction.

  • Libb@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I would not stay nearby.

    Imho this ‘trend’ will end:

    • the day enough of the wearers start getting punched in the face. Not that I encourage anyone to do that, I don’t, but seeing how… angry and and willing to fight so many people already are, I can’t imagine it won’t happen more and more as those stupid glasses become more common.
    • If enough people start shaming them/their behavior, and it becomes a hurdle to wear those in public.

    Otherwise, it will probably become as ‘normal’ as messaging people sitting right next to you instead of, you know, talking to them.

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If I ever see someone with those glasses I will straight up punch them in the eye. I am not kidding. I would rather have someone walk around with a gun than those (and guns are illegal here)