headline: trump saves baby from house fire
The story: trump was escaping a fire in his pedophile sex trafficking dungeon and accidentally knocked a crib out the door as he ran by
As he ran by…🤣
Stumbled
Putted by on a rascal scooter
Why so contrvived?
In his panic he accidentally carried one of his sex victims to safety.
It was still ‘attached’ to him…
Let’s not make it graphic. We can be disgusted by concepts alone.
It’s hilarious that it wasn’t graphic to you before that, mate. 😄
Omg no. Its sad that that’s where your mind went first. I’m glad mine didn’t. It doesn’t need to be graphic to be disagreeable.
Then you haven’t been paying enough attention to what they don’t want you to remember, namely;
Trump and Epstein were inseparable fuck buddies that specialised in underage, unwilling participants.
Trump is a narcissistic, corrupt, paedophile whose every move is to do his utterly incompetent best to keep his history from catching up to him, ad infinitum.
The real wonder of the whole sorry fucking shitshow is that so many gormless fucking cunts are taken in by his syphilitic ramblings or provably false promises, and thus assist the ambulatory binbag of spray-painted second hand cumrags in his obvious grift.
The US as a whole deserves the public international humiliation being collectively reaped for allowing such a heinous example of a human being anywhere near power or influence, let alone celebrating and elevating it to their supposed highest office.
/Rant
Hey can you take your performative pearl clutching back to reddit thanks.
Trumps rapes women and young girls and the Republicans aren’t mad at all.
I didn’t even need an “if” at all.
Probably because he never would and everyone would be in disbelief that someone would make such an outlandish announcement.
It would be more believable if he sent ICE in to arrest the baby to deport it after ICE set the fire.
That or he would have been the on that started the fire while trying to give the baby to the Epstine estate.
That will make a good story. We’ll call it A Song of Ice and Fire.
Just make sure you never ever finish it.
But only after he raped both the mother of the baby and the baby itself
Of course he would, it’s the adult he wouldn’t save. Too old.
The fun thing is, we know Trump wouldn’t do anything to help someone, anyone, in a burning building.
There was a wealthy, elderly man who hit his head at Mar-a-Lago some years back. Trump noted he frantically looked for someone to clean up the blood because he was worried about the marble. And then the next day, was still bitching about the blood and how the marble looked different.
He’s not going into any burning building for anyone. No matter age, no matter wealth, that man is a coward. Always has been, always will be. Their post should be “Imagine if Trump didn’t dodge the draft…” because they’d have to imply he wasn’t already a spineless coward 60 years ago.
There’s literal video footage of him standing around, bored, in the Oval Office, seemingly annoyed that he still has to be standing, while people tend to a guy who fainted a few feet away from him.
That’s a bit unfair. He did struggle to a standing position and then stare like he was trying out a new pair of eyes. I had more fun watching RFK Jr. as the coke was wearing off.
I did not know this happened so I am glad you shared that
There are two documented accounts of him having fits of generosity. One where he laid on a Trump jet converted for medical transport of a child across the US for an operation; and one where his car broke down, he hitchhiked with a guy, and he paid off the guy’s mortgage as thanks.
Note that both instances quoted simply involved throwing down money.
Back in the '80s, trump offered to pay the funeral expenses of a child who had been killed by a bear. He then reneged, naturally enough.
Yeah because he would have lit that fire.
… knowing the baby was in there
He didn’t light the fire he just wanted to have sex with the baby
Because he never would. Heres a video of him standing around completely lost when an old guy faints in his presence.
Please make sure to strip the tracking parameters when you share a YouTube video! Everything after (and including) the “?” Serves only to track the people you share to.
For anyone under the age of 16, he is the fire.
Only because it burns when he pees
Out of the fire, into the dicking pan
When I went through boot camp many decades ago, my ti had a great saying about ifs, “if worms had machine guns then birds wouldn’t fuck with them”. One of the very few things I still remember from boot camp. Also release all the Epstein files.
If my grandmother had wheels, she’d be a bicycle.
And if a frog had wings he wouldn’t bump his ass when he hopped
Honestly we probably have enough Epstein data to start getting to work
If “ifs” and “buts” were candy and nuts, EVERY DAY would be Christmas.
My 9th grade history teacher said this one time and I say it to my kids now.
“…, yutz.”
Trump raped babies and Republicans still love him. So…
MAGA is so unredeemable, the only arguments they have for voting for them are hypothetical situations for which they can invent a heroic ending for their candidates.
What choice do they have? Run on their experience as crooks, traitors, racists, rapists, and pedophiles?
There’s a saying: if a grandma had a beard she would be grandpa.
Also, if a grandma had wheels she would be a bike.
I don’t really get that one. A wheel chair seems more likely.
You’re one of todays lucky 10000: https://youtu.be/A-RfHC91Ewc
And if a frog had wings he wouldn’t bump his ass when he hopped
What I find really interesting is that the MAGA type are literally incapable of defending Trump on his own merits, they always resort to some sort of logical fallacy that deflects, distracts, or misinterprets. It implies that they are in some degree aware that Trump is indefensible, but they defend him anyway because they’re brain dead and their entire ethos is built around dishonesty.
Don’t forget the racism. Dishonesty and racism.
Of course liberals are going to be mad, hes just going to rape it.
Trump’s first term teemed with moments that Trump did the right thing (they were rare, but, y’know, the broken clock rule) and left-wing pundits would say yeah, it’s good that Trump did that.
Then he’d tweet something obnoxious about it. Or when he was thrown off Twitter, would Truth his obnoxious commentary. Sometimes it was about him taking credit, or regretting that he had to do that thing, or walking back is rational statements in favor of irrational ones.
But there were a lot of pundits who believed principle over loyalty, and would give Trump credit when it was due.
Trump’s first term teemed with moments that Trump did the right thing (they were rare, but, y’know, the broken clock rule)
I think “teemed with” suggests that it was “overflowing with”. Which is like the opposite of “rare”.
True. I was saying that the pundits teemed with praise for Trump, not that Trump’s positive acts teemed themselves.
I could totally have worded it better.
