• Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        Did they? I thought they’re contribution to both wars was about even in that they really didn’t do much.

        They spent WWI running into Austrian machine guns for almost no gain, much like the rest of Europe. And WWII they seem to just have fucked around in North Africa for a while until the allies kicked them out and invaded them.

        I don’t think either war would have really turned out differently if Italy had just remained neutral

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 days ago

          There’s a good chance Hitler would have won if he hadn’t wasted so much time and military assets in North Africa, Southeast Europe and Italy. He would have faced an even larger fraction of the British navy but Germany’s navy was already hopelessly outclassed as it was.

    • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 days ago

      I’m sure there’s a joke in there about Paraguay being on the receiving end of a lot of Nazis fleeing to South America after WW2.