• ivanafterall@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Since there aren’t any spider scientists present, I’ll take a stab at it:

    This is probably some kind of bullshit oversimplification. There was probably like one study by some professor who loves LSD and spiders at a small rural college in New Zealand who published a paper in Spider Science Journal. And it’s not singing so much as some very complex and scientific spider stuff that I won’t bore you with.

    Hopefully I’m just cynical and wrong and there’s a little spider Pavarotti out there.

    • lol3droflxp@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That pretty much hits the nail on the head. Most of this X does “human like™️” stuff Y is anthropomorphism par excellence. Usually some form of instinctual behaviour or even simple results of basic physiological processes are compared to stuff that humans do as a high level cognitive process (singing, talking, etc.) so that it generates clicks and draws attention.
      This paints a completely wrong picture of animal (or even plant) behaviour, spreads misinformation and overshadows the actually interesting scientific discoveries.