Here’s an archive of the article if you’re wanting to read it and having technical difficulties (or for anyone else who is; sorry, the Wayback Machine doesn’t capture the full article).
I was never going to assume you were lying about your experience if you claimed “there is no article”; it’d be such a batshit claim if you knew one existed.
Since we’re now insulting each other, I want you to know that shortly I will block you, as Lemmy is a much better place when we’re not interacting with people who make us want to insult each other. Goodbye.
I said “it’d be a batshit claim if” followed by something that I acknowledged wasn’t true – a hypothetical. As in it would’ve been batshit to knowingly lie about that. I understood why you couldn’t read the article, but why you couldn’t understand this basic if/then statement is beyond me.
I’m not sure if you’re using a broken app or something but there is definitely text there. Here are the first three paragraphs.
President Donald Trump has allowec
the use of cheaper red-dyed diesel.
typically reserved for farm operations,
to be used more broadly in an attempt
to bring down record-high fuel costs
Trump signed an executive order
Monday evening stateside to
temporarily allow truckers and
farmers to use red-dved diesel -
which is exempt from highway fuek
taxes - and deferred related taxes on
the fuel through the end of this year
The tax-free diesel is typically used by
farm equipment, construction
machinery, trucks and other off-road
vehicles. It is therefore exempt from a
24.4-cent-per-gallon tax applied to
dliesel fuel sold for highway
transportation.
There is no text in the article, it’s just a headline. I can take a screen shot to prove it, but you’re just a nobody.
Here’s an archive of the article if you’re wanting to read it and having technical difficulties (or for anyone else who is; sorry, the Wayback Machine doesn’t capture the full article).
I was never going to assume you were lying about your experience if you claimed “there is no article”; it’d be such a batshit claim if you knew one existed.
This is what the CNBC link looks like in my browser backing up my “batshit claim”.
Since we’re now insulting each other, I want you to know that shortly I will block you, as Lemmy is a much better place when we’re not interacting with people who make us want to insult each other. Goodbye.
I said “it’d be a batshit claim if” followed by something that I acknowledged wasn’t true – a hypothetical. As in it would’ve been batshit to knowingly lie about that. I understood why you couldn’t read the article, but why you couldn’t understand this basic if/then statement is beyond me.
I hope you realize that you look like a complete dickhead in this exchange.
I was insulted first but I’m the dickhead? Wrong.
Just letting you know. Continue digging your hole, I guess.
I’m not sure if you’re using a broken app or something but there is definitely text there. Here are the first three paragraphs.
Here’s what CNBC looks like in my browser.
https://i.postimg.cc/2y27s0pw/Screenshot-2026-10-06-at-09-01-39-Trump-allows-cheaper-diesel-on-highways-as-fuel-costs-surge.png
Your mom definitely doesn’t say no to my body.
My mom died multiple decades ago, which, if your statement was true, would make you a necrophiliac.
Hell yeah brotha