The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

  • efrique@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    damn

    Among other issues that’s going to make it harder for them to do other stuff.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can someone please scrape the Internet Archive before it gets shut down?

    There’s no backup. Imagine all that we’ll lose.

    • Dave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not the entire Internet Archive that has been found infringing. The judgment applies only to the Internet Archive’s lending of digital books without limiting the number of copies.

    • Icalasari@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      5 years protection should be the limit. If you can’t make back costs and get a tidy sum in 5 years, you fucked up. Especially as most sales are within the first few months

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah. I think if you can’t defend your own secrets, you shouldn’t have taxpayer resources to do it for you.

  • NateNate60@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I remember my aunt (lawyer) coming up with some insane conspiracy-level solution to this problem:

    The Supreme Court has ruled in Allen v. Cooper that Congressional attempts to make US state governments liable for copyright infringement are unconstitutional. In other words, US states can’t be sued for copyright infringement under US federal law without their permission. Under standard federal jurisprudence, all subdivisions and departments of a state are considered to be the state they are a part of for the purposes of sovereign immunity. This also applies to organisations that receive most of their funding from and are wholly dependent on state government agencies as well.

    The solution would be to have a friend state government either:

    • donate a copious amount of money to the Internet Archive to make it “financially dependent” on that state government, or
    • in cooperation with the Internet Archive, pass a law that makes the Internet Archive an independent state agency of that government (probably safer in terms of keeping the IA independent)

    This would make the IA fully immune from copyright lawsuits because they would benefit from their patron state’s sovereign immunity. But it comes at the cost that the patron state has a lot of power over the IA. A considerable trade-off.