They should have banned book burning for political reason. Like this they wouldn’t have created a blasphemy law.

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Denmark’s parliament has banned the “inappropriate treatment” of religious texts - with a bill widely known in the country as the Quran law.

Denmark and neighbouring Sweden have recently seen a number of street protests over such incidents, raising security concerns in Scandinavia.

During Thursday’s heated debates in Denmark’s 179-strong parliament, the Folketing, many opposition MPs argued against the bill.

“History will judge us harshly for this, and with good reason… What it all comes down to is whether a restriction on freedom of speech is determined by us, or whether it is dictated from the outside,” Inger Stojberg, leader of the Denmark Democrats, was quoted as saying by Reuters news agency.

But the country’s centre-right coalition government of Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen argued that criticising religion would remain legal, as the bill would only have a marginal impact.

Back in August, when the government was proposing the changes, ministers said they wanted to send a signal to the world after witnessing over a few weeks 170 demonstrations, including Quran burnings in front of foreign embassies.

The original article contains 275 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 36%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

I am against the burning of books disguised as freedom of speech.

1. It is bad for the environment. Too much co2 production in the process. If you must destroy books, recycle them!

2. The Nazis did this very popularly. I always get reminded of that, when people burn books.

3. I feel it is a very marginal impact into freedom of speech. I can not remember a single occasion where I had to burn a book to be able to articulate my thoughts.

4. I think most countries ban burning houses, even if it is infringing the freedom of speech. Why should it be different with books?