JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-22 years agoFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up114arrow-down10
arrow-up114arrow-down1imageFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-22 years agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoThis is a pinetime it looks like. You should get one, open source and $30.
minus-squareramsay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 years agoDoes it support the watch command? user@watch:~ $ watch now Otherwise, who knows when “now” was… /s
minus-squarePsythik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoWatches should be round IMO. I’m happy with my Samsung Watch 4 Classic.
minus-squareAceticon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoYeah, but square screens are way cheaper to procure and to program for, and every little helps in an open source project aiming for $30.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agohonestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
This is a pinetime it looks like.
You should get one, open source and $30.
Does it support the
watchcommand?user@watch:~ $ watch nowOtherwise, who knows when “now” was…
/s
Watches should be round IMO. I’m happy with my Samsung Watch 4 Classic.
Yeah, but square screens are way cheaper to procure and to program for, and every little helps in an open source project aiming for $30.
honestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother