• huginn@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you want devs to make apps without any monetization you’re limiting the number of devs that will develop for your platform.

    Free only means you only allow passion projects that people work on as a side project or only the developers rich enough to have retired already.

    Nobody who is struggling to get by can spend all their time developing a free app that has 0 monetization.

    So they monetize on Google Play.

    If you care about breaking Google’s control of Android you should cheer on another paid marketplace, especially one out of the clutches of Amazon.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you want devs to make apps without any monetization you’re limiting the number of devs that will develop for your platform.

      So?

      The point of fdroid is not to have evil pieces of shit injecting their apps with spyware and ads.

      • FierySpectre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Developers deserve to be paid for their time though…

        Sure for many it’s nothing but a hobby and they’re happy to create something for free. But that doesn’t mean every developer needs to do the same.

        And yes ads are a privacy nightmare and putting them into your app is bad. So either you only use apps from hobbyists or you pay for access (whether that be a set price for a finished product or a subscription for a service).

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      F-Droid is literally just a repository. Linux manages it just fine to have repo driven “store” apps.