• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Intel has not halted sales or clawed back any inventory. It will not do a recall, period.

    Buy AMD. Got it!

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve been buying AMD for – holy shit – 25 years now, and have never once regretted it. I don’t consider myself a fanboi; I just (a) prefer having the best performance-per-dollar rather than best performance outright, and (b) like rooting for the underdog.

      But if Intel keeps fucking up like this, I might have to switch on grounds of (b)!

      spoiler

      (Realistically I’d be more likely to switch to ARM or even RISCV, though. Even if Intel became an underdog, my memory of their anti-competitive and anti-consumer bad behavior remains long.)

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        arm is very primed to take a lot of market share of server market from intel. Amazon is already very committed on making their graviton arm cpu their main cpu, which they own a huge lion share of the server market on alone.

        for consumers, arm adoption is fully reliant on the respective operating systems and compatibility to get ironed out.

        • icydefiance@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, I manage the infrastructure for almost 150 WordPress sites, and I moved them all to ARM servers a while ago, because they’re 10% or 20% cheaper on AWS.

          Websites are rarely bottlenecked by the CPU, so that power efficiency is very significant.

          • tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I really think that most people who think that they want ARM machines are wrong, at least given the state of things in 2024. Like, maybe you use Linux…but do you want to run x86 Windows binary-only games? Even if you can get 'em running, you’ve lost the power efficiency. What’s hardware support like? Do you want to be able to buy other components? If you like stuff like that Framework laptop, which seems popular on here, an SoC is heading in the opposite direction of that – an all-in-one, non-expandable manufacturer-specified system.

            But yours is a legit application. A non-CPU-constrained datacenter application running open-source software compiled against ARM, where someone else has validated that the hardware is all good for the OS.

            I would not go ARM for a desktop or laptop as things stand, though.

            • batshit@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              If you didn’t want to game on your laptop, would an ARM device not be better for office work? Considering they’re quiet and their battery lasts forever.

              • frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                ARM chips aren’t better at power efficiency compared to x84 above 10 or 15W or so. Apple is getting a lot out of them because TSMC 3nm; even the upcoming AMD 9000 series will only be on TSMC 4nm.

                ARM is great for having more than one competent company in the market, though.

                • batshit@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  ARM chips aren’t better at power efficiency compared to x84 above 10 or 15W or so.

                  Do you have a source for that? It seems a bit hard to believe.

  • gearheart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This would be funny if it happened to Nvidia.

    Hope Intel recovers from this. Imagine if Nvidia was the only consumer hardware manufacturer…

    No one wants that.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This would be funny if it happened to Nvidia.

      Hope Intel recovers from this. Imagine if Nvidia was the only consumer hardware manufacturer…

      Lol there was a reason Xbox 360s had a whopping 54% failure rate and every OEM was getting sued in the late 2000s for chip defects.

          • icedterminal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Tagging on here: Both the first model PS3 and Xbox 360 were hot boxes with insufficient cooling. Both suffered from getting too hot too fast for their cooling solutions to keep up. Resulting in hardware stress that caused the chips solder points to weaken until they eventually cracked.

            • john89@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Owner of original 60gb PS3 here.

              It got very hot and eventually stopped working. It was under warranty and I got an 80gb replacement for $200 cheaper, but lost out on backwards compatibility which really sucked because I sold my PS2 to get a PS3.

  • sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Is there really still such a market for Intel CPUs? I do not understand that AMDs Zen is so much better and is the superior technology since almost a decade now.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Intel is in the precarious position of being the largest surviving American owned semiconductor manufacturer, with the competition either existing abroad (TSMC, Samsung, ASML) or as a partner/subsidiary of a foreign national firm (NVidia simply procures its chips from TSMC, GlobalFoundries was bought up by the UAE sovereign wealth fund, etc).

      Consequently, whenever the US dumps a giant bucket of money into the domestic semiconductor industry, Intel is there to clean up whether or not their technology actually works.

  • demesisx@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The other day, when this news hit for the first time, I bought two ITM Put options on INTC. Then, I waited three days and sold them for 200% profit. Then, I used the profit to invest in the SOXX etf. Feels good to finally get some profit from INTC’s incompetence.

    edit: haters of gambling with the downvotes?