• andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Fuckos took the worst possible shot of AOC into the article. IDK what’s this mediaite site is, but they seem to present her position as stupid.

    Look at how Donald is presented even in articles he’s criticized in.

    • rabber@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah the bias is immediately obvious, it’s not even their photo so they very deliberately chose this

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    AOC is definitely a voice in politics I’ve come to respect. I can assume pretty confidently that her opinion is well founded and with the right intentions… if she thinks Biden is best option at this point, that tells me pretty conclusively that Biden is genuinely the best option at this point.

    The debate shenanigans, the age, whatever: all of that is a fraction of a drop in the ocean compared to the shitstorm that would be Trump presidency. It doesn’t matter if any of us like Biden. Do you want a literal fascist running the country? If no, vote Biden. If yes, abstain / vote for literally anyone else.

    • rabber@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I wish it was possible to convince trump supporters that he’s literally not on their side

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Someone mentioned it in the thread about Elizabeth Warren supporting Biden. It isn’t odd that smart, anti-wealthy, and anti-Trump at all costs progressives are backing Biden, and wealthy Democrat donors and centrist Democrats are demanding change.

    These people see the risk a new candidate would bring. The wealthy just want someone who reflects their image. Either candidate doesn’t really hurt their lifestyle.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It isn’t odd that smart, anti-wealthy, and anti-Trump at all costs progressives are backing Biden, and wealthy Democrat donors and centrist Democrats are demanding change.

      The wealthy centrist Dems believe they’re in an excellent position to foist an even bigger turd on the party (I’ve seen Joe Manchin and Michael Bloomberg and - of fucking course - Hillary Clinton floated as “moderate” replacements to Far-Left Super Radical Joe Biden).

      The younger and less influential (although hardly anti-wealthy - AOC is a prodigious fundraiser who represents one of the richest districts in the nation) politicians who have already stacked up political favors with the incumbent don’t want to see him casually replaced by an even more obnoxious neoliberal.

      That doesn’t make Biden a strong choice. It doesn’t even make him an “anti-wealthy” choice (Biden was fully on board with the Wall Street bailouts under Bush and the Silicon Valley bailouts during his own term). It just makes him the “safe” choice for the AOC-aligned caucus, relative to an even more nakedly corporate convention insider pick.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Et tu, AOC?

    I agree with much of what AOC has to say, but not this. I’ll bet significant money if Biden remains the nominee that we will lose, unfortunately.

    (lol whew there is some serious vote manipulation going on around these parts. I hope admins begin implementing some safeguards soon).

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ll bet significant money if Biden remains the nominee that we will lose

      In a repeat of 2016, we found the most beatable candidate in the Democratic Party and ran that person for President. sigh

      (lol whew there is some serious vote manipulation going on around these parts. I hope admins begin implementing some safeguards soon).

      There is a strong contingent of Blue MAGA on Lemmy. Anything even remotely critical of Our Dear Leader gets trashed, your account gets reported, and people spill out of the woodworking insisting that you are on the personal payroll of one Mr. V. Vladimirovich Putin or possibly the insidious Hand of the Dragon Himself, CCP Supervillain Xi Jinping.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Progressives will be absolutely woodchippered if they did anything otherwise. Prob best to stand this one out and let the centrists fight it out. AOC is as delusional as Biden if she thinks he can win this. Not a great look.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      AOC strikes me as someone who sees the game as is. She won’t endorse anyone but Democratic nominee, presumptive or otherwise.

    • HaleHirsute@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t know who downvotes like insanity around here, I think there is a lot of validity in your take.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There is a cult forming around the denial of the reality around Biden as candidate. The current working term is Blue Maga. Lemmt seems to be a kind of epic enter but it’s the exact kind of thing that when Russian propagandists found it, they were able to create The Donald.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Also note how the vote totals work. Someone makes a “don’t vote for Biden, trust me I’m totally a progressive” post and it immediately gets a ton of upvotes. Someone makes a “hey this whole ‘don’t vote’ thing is kind of stupid” post and it immediately gets a ton of downvotes. But if the post gets big enough, real people balance the vote totals out. The initial votes were just bots/trolls trying to influence the tone of the discussion.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I dont think they are bots. Unless you have direct evidence of that, you shouldn’t believe it. I think they are misguided individuals in deep denial of the reality they are in. I mean one of the biggest members of Blue Maga is the head of this sub. And its IDENTICAL to what/ how r/TheDonald formed, its just that a nation state actor hasn’t swooped in to take advantage of the latent properties that would lead to the formation of a cult.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Unless you have direct evidence of that, you shouldn’t believe it.

              That’s a dangerous tack to take.

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Such is the consequence of living in a fact based reality as opposed to ones own delusions.

                You get to believe a whole lot less because there is actually very little we have evidence for.

                BUT!

                If we have evidence for it, we should believe it.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Direct evidence is a much higher bar than indirect evidence. There’s a profusion of indirect evidence. Few of us have the capabilities to potentially find direct evidence. And even if we could, we would be expending far more effort researching than they would making new alt accounts.