Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asserted that no world leader has the right to negotiate with Russian President Vladimir Putin on behalf of Ukraine.

Speaking to Le Parisien readers, Zelenskyy emphasized that Ukraine alone determines its future and any dialogue with Russia must follow a peace plan based on strength and international support.

He warned against negotiating without clear guarantees of security, highlighting the risks of Putin resuming aggression after a ceasefire.

Zelenskyy called for a strategy ensuring Ukraine’s long-term stability and security, beyond NATO or EU membership timelines.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    20 hours ago

    You’d think this would be a fairly cut and dry issue - the countries helping Ukraine wouldn’t like it either if another country started negotiating terms on their behalf (especially not with a monster like Putin).

    Ukraine and its people should be the ones to decide their own fate.

    I swear people who think otherwise must’ve read David vs. Goliath and sided with the Goliath.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Hey Goliath was clearly in the right. David brought a gun to a fist fight, bastard never should have been allowed to walk free after that level of cheating.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      19 hours ago

      must’ve read David vs. Goliath and sided with the Goliath.

      Bold of you to assume that they can read, or that they have read the Bible.

      In my experience not even “devout Christians” do that last one.

            • ouch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Honestly I’m not qualified enough to make educated guesses what type of texts those are. As in, are they written in a form that insinuates to be literal stories. The teachings of those stories are pretty understandable, though.

              Some say that the oldest stories are reverse prophecies. And we know how accurate prophecies are considered in general.

              The Bible is not a science book, but one of relationship between God and man.

              • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                It’s interesting that that relationship changes, isn’t it? Like, early on God is the sort of deity to turn you into salt or flood the world if He’s displeased. And over time, He does that sort of spiteful intervention less and less. It’s hard not to see it as Him getting wiser and more compassionate. But… if He’s all powerful and all knowing to begin with, why does His approach to people change?

        • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          100%. Reading the Bible cover to cover + learning about the history of how Judaism was born out of the polytheistic Yahwism and the resulting merge between Yahweh and the chief Canaanite god El was the way I just kept pulling the thread until it all came apart. The inconsistencies between an omnibenevolent god (El) and violent massacring war god (Yahweh) make a lot more sense once you know they used to be two separate gods.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      17 hours ago

      What about the country sending the most aid to Ukraine, without which Ukraine could not continue the war, being the one at the negotiating table?

        • john89@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Then why is Ukraine constantly upset US isn’t giving enough aid?

          Also, Europe supplies more aid to Ukraine than the US.

          You might not realize this, but you’re comparing a continent to a country. US is still “the country sending the most aid to Ukraine,” which I said in my previous comment.

            • john89@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Yeah, but according to the other commenter Ukraine “doesn’t need it” and he doesn’t want Ukraine to be reliant on the US.

              So… they both do and don’t need aid from the US? Lol.

              • ammonium@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                It’s not that hard. They don’t need aid to continue to fight, but they do need aid to be able to win.

              • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                15 hours ago

                I see what you’re trying to say and I agree but this isn’t the right echo chamber to be talking like that.

        • john89@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          16 hours ago

          And take their aid along with them?

          What if this means Ukraine is no longer able to defend itself?

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Then they can fuck off across the ocean with their aid. Ukraine isn’t the US’s puppet.

            • john89@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Alright well, I guess it can be Russia’s puppet then.

              • Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Uh huh, it would be less a russian puppet than the US negotiating another countries’ fate.

              • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                14 hours ago

                to paraphrase an old Polish quote, (on dealing with Russians) “The Rubble is preferable to Russian Dominion”

                • john89@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 hours ago

                  Maybe it’s just me, but life in Ukraine didn’t look all that different from life in Russia before the invasion.

                  Both nations are far behind the civilized world when it comes to social issues. Corruption was cited as a major reason for denying Ukraine entrance into NATO.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 hours ago

                    Maybe it’s just me, but life in Ukraine didn’t look all that different from life in Russia before the invasion.

                    You mean apart from all the dead Ukrainians and the ethnic cleansing and the kidnapped children and such?

                  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    14 hours ago

                    the difference beforehand was that prior to the shooting (big shooting at least). One was a flawed democracy that was trying to improve, and trying to do to itself what Poland did to itself after 20-30 years in NATO and EU.

                    the other was an authoritarian mob state. going from one to the other, was evidently worth fighting to the death over, I am inclined to agree.