Is the discrimination worth it as a deterrent? Or is it just to save the instance companies $$$?

  • fiat_lux@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    From a dictionary perspective, you’re right. From a business legal risk-avoidant and financial self-protection perspective, you’re dead wrong. Words are often used with a context-specific definition, and you’re not supposed to use the word ‘discrimination’ at all in a workplace. Because it will cause the legal and HR departments more work, and therefore cost the organisation more.

    Just let the HR rep do the script and teach you how to avoid accountability when prioritising profit over people. It’s less painful that way.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just let the HR rep do the script and teach you how to avoid accountability when prioritising profit over people. It’s less painful that way.

      Profit over people IS painful to me. Eat the rich.

      • fiat_lux@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also painful to me, which is why I sat quietly through the training, gave the answers they wanted, and then made managerial decisions that were deliberately people-prioritising and at least somewhat inconspicuous. Luckily, they had trained me to know what they’re looking for.