• HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    It cracks me up the way he says buy and the us should own it. Lets say it even happened the way we bought alaska. it would make it the 51st state. it would make it part of us and much like alaska it determine how resources are used and likely have its own fund to encourage people to come liver there. but he talks like it would be a possession the way the us owns florida or texas.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Would not make anything a state. Have you seen Puerto Rico? Guam? American Samoa?

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        puerto rico is not a state because every time the opportunity arose they voted not to be one. guam and american samoa im not really sure whats going on.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            oh common. do you think thats a legitamate example. it was carved out of maryland and virginia for the specific purpose of being the capital with no state having authority over it.

              • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                yeah and the area is run by the federal government so not having federal representation is basically like not having state representation to boot.

              • futatorius@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                it was also not meant to have a civilian population at all

                Meaning that its population was almost entirely African-American and therefore to be ignored.

            • Nougat@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              And the people who live there don’t have representation in Congress, but that’s not the point.

              The point is that it’s not a state. Just “being a possession of the United States” doesn’t confer statehood.

              • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                yes but again its not typical it was a very specific thing. The land had belonged to two different states. the guam, puerto rico, us virgin islands are similar but dc is in on way similar.

                • Nougat@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Alaska was purchased by the US in 1867. It didn’t get statehood until 1959.

                  Being a possession of the United States of America does not automatically make it a state.

                  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    true but its basically a bureaucracy thing at that point. as long as the it has a populace and they seek statehood its going to happen.