• RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s a silly argument. You can objectively compare virtually any two things.

      You’d really not care if someone said they’d clone Kim Kardashian or Elon Musk but you had to choose one?

      • 5in1k@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Well my diarrhea yesterday was chunky and today it’s straight liquid. Both are shit. Kinda like Mr.Beast and any of the other fame whores.

        • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Do you honestly not find one preferable?

          That’s the discussion we’re having: do lessers of two evils exist?

          Obviously they do. Anyone arguing otherwise is just arguing for arguing’s sake or is painfully and hilariously naive.

        • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          You seem to have forgotten the context of the conversation and fallen in love with fighting with me.

          Which is better:

          • A rich person who gives to charity

          • A rich person who does not

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            My premise is that billionaires suck.

            Philanthropy porn sucks.

            A billionaire giving shit away to lower their tax burden and engage in more philanthropy porn to make themselves even more money is even shittier.

            If you want to force the conversation toward semantics to make yourself right over a relative determination that one is better (less shitty), go ahead. If that’s what constitutes “better” for you.

            • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yeah, and mine is that some suck worse than others.

              You keep pretending that’s not the case, though. It’s cute.

          • sartalon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            To your argument, Kim Kardashian has actually helped people, she has helped get innocent people exonerated and released from prison.

            I would argue her charitable work is VASTLY more substantial than Mr. Beasts’.

            Having said that… They are both terrible people and the world would be a better place without either one of them. They are both absolute whores for attention and could have achieved the same amount of charitable service without throwing themselves in front of a camera for it. Arguably stealing attention away from the people that did the actual work.