I want to talk about our gateway products to open source. You know, that one product or software that made us go, “Whoa, this is amazing!” and got us hooked on the world of open source.

What made you to jump ships? Was it the “free” side of things like qBittorrent? Did you even know that some of your programs are open source before you got into the topic?

For me those products were:

  • Android
  • Firefox
  • VLC
  • Calibre

Am thinking to order some merch and I wanna make it more accessible to people unfamilliar with open source culture. Now, am looking for fairly normalized but still underrepresented product – maybe it could serve as a conversation starter and push some people to open source

  • dosse91@lemmy.trippy.pizza
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    For me it was a combination of factors: Windows has been going down the shitter for at least 10 years now, FOSS software has been getting better and better, and I’ve learned to use more FOSS tools as I grew tired of dealing with Windows.

    If I had to point at one project that made me go “Wow, this is amazing”, I’d say ffmpeg. Even in my Windows days, I’ve always enjoyed digital preservation, when I discovered ffmpeg around 2015 it was an eye opener, so many features, so many options, I’ve been using it on a daily basis ever since.

  • MangoKangaroo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Although I technically used OSS before (ie Firefox), Linux (Ubuntu) is what made me actually start caring about it.

  • klangcola@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox 1.0

    Not only was it better than IE6, it was also free! Not sure how aware I was of the libre aspect initially, but around the same time I also dabled in (Mandrake? Mandriva?) Linux, which exposed me to GNU, GPL, and the idea of copyleft.

    And then there was VLC.

  • Link.wav [he/him]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Like other people have said, I’ve used open-source software for decades without thinking about it, but what really made me think about it as a concept was when I got into Skyrim modding, and I saw the exorbitant subscription fees of Photoshop and then learned through that community about GIMP. Then, I started learning more about things like privacy and more tangible effects of corporate greed, and gradually switched to more alternatives.

    However, I personally never tried a FOSS OS until the last couple months when someone on Lemmy talked me into trying Linux. I always thought it was only for people with high levels of technical skills, but it turns out there are distros that are extremely accessible to users like myself.

    • MudMan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man, that’s a rough entry point. I’ve been waiting for GIMP to get good for decades, and I’ve accepted now it’s probably not gonna happen.

      You’re such a disappointment, GIMP. Blender is right there, why can’t you be more like Blender?

      • Link.wav [he/him]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think I’m blissfully unaware of what a good photo-editing software looks like since I’ve used GIMP for almost everything. I might struggle with an app that’s good actually, because I’ve learned in one that I’ve heard many times is hard to navigate.

        • MudMan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hah. Yeah, I guess it sucks having learned Photoshop before it was an outright scam, because there is no good alternative.

          Let me caveat that: there’s actually great art software that’s either cheap or free and there are many basic quick photo editing apps. But broad image manipulation and in-depth photo editing? It’s GIMP or nothing, and GIMP is definitely not it.

          • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Note that for vector graphics editing, Inkscape is really good. That doesn’t help you if you need to edit photos, though.

            • MudMan@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, it’s just that specific hole in the landscape where GIMP has become the default and nobody else is doing better despite being the part of the ecosystem that Adobe holds with the tightest grip. It’s extremely annoying.

          • Link.wav [he/him]@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I actually did use Paint.net at one point as well, because there was an improved format that GIMP just straight up didn’t support, so at one point I was creating textures for my mods in GIMP, then opening the files in Paint.net and exporting them again lol

            To be fair, I’m not a graphic designer, but I did have to learn about things like using layers to create glow maps, so GIMP worked just fine for a scrub like myself, but I can understand for anything more serious it would have some limitations

            • MudMan@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not a graphic designer either, so I also use it for, say scanning documents and stuff like that. But I’ll be honest, if it takes more than that I’ll often just load into some mobile app meant for the edit I need to make just to avoid GIMP’s backwards UI.

              • Link.wav [he/him]@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                My biggest grip with mobile apps, even for simple edits, is that none of them seem to support layers. I understand maybe it’s a performance thing, but it sure would be nice to be able to do some very basic things in a pinch when I’m away from my laptop or PC.

                Edit: *gripe

      • Jummit@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re still looking, try Krita, it’s a polished and powerful open source image manipulation program.

        • MudMan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve tried Krita, but it’s primarily a painting tool, not really a Photoshop alternative for other tasks. It’s very solid for what it’s meant to do, though.

          • Jummit@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Makes sense. I never used Photoshop, so I don’t know how it compares. It’s been good enough for my needs so far.

  • seSvxR3ull7LHaEZFIjM@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For me it was first VLC without really knowing what FOSS was, then KeePass while getting to know a bit about it, and finally Thunderbird. What did it for me was just how good and bullshit-free they were, especially in comparison to paid competitors. They really are the best products in their field, proving the quality often behind FOSS software.

      • Mountaineer@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        FOSS is enshitification-hardened, not proof.

        VLC remains awesome because the guy (maybe Jean-Baptiste Kempf?) that controls the project has refused to be bought, has in fact refused HUGE sums of money.

        The original author of any project has to right to sell it with the corresponding licence changes at any time.
        There’s some legal grey area on something like Linux or VLC which have MANY MANY developer hands in the pie, and existing users could certainly fork off the existing releases, but VLC could pivot tomorrow to a for profit company and make future releases of the official VLC a paid product, if they choose too.

        • klangcola@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, and so all honour to the creators for remaining FOSS, especially smaller projects spearheaded by a single dev

          Altough usually when a shift like that happens in bigger projects there’s a community fork, and the original project withers. Like Owncloud -> Nextcloud , OpenOffice -> LibreOffice, MySQL -> MariaDB

          You could argue there’s some degree enshitification through the Ubuntu snapification driven by Canonical. Although that’s not so much about making Ubuntu deliberately worse, it’s more moving Ubuntu forward in a way that aligns with Canonical’s strategic goals. So its “paying the strategy tax” rather than direct enshitification.

          For collaborative projects like Linux I believe every contributor would need to agree to any license change, which is practically impossible

  • RickRussell_CA@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Emacs.

    No really, it was like 1989 and I had to learn Unix systems for classes, and this white haired Emacs advocate convinced me to try it.

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There really wasn’t a specific gateway product, and I’m still using closed and open source solutions back to back.

    User experience and user interface are more important to me than open source. The only consideration I have beyond that would be privacy & security.

    For instance I’ve always used Firefox and rejected Chrome due to data privacy concerns, and would use a portable chromium installation if a website was inaccessible with FF. On the other hand side MS Office and Photoshop are vastly superior to libre office and gimp.

    When it comes to applications I use once in a blue moon for a few minutes at a time, I’ll usually go for FOSS, but moreso because it’s free and the UI can be as ugly as it wants if I don’t have to stare at it for hours on end.

    And well, I absolutely despise Apple as a company, so using Android was pretty much without alternatives, after BlackBerry discontinued their OS.

    • Crotaro@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m very much the same. It mostly depends on “does the open source program do what I need/want?” If not, I’m okay with using a closed source version of it.

      My current number one example here would be spreadsheet calculators. Years ago (and for my personal use) I only used LibreOffice/OpenOffice because it did/does all I need. But at work I need to use MS Excel not only because it’s what the company has but also because the tables function and everything that relates to it (like data slicers, automatic expansion of formulas and formats, etc.) is really awesome and either super complex to replicate or straight up impossible in LibreOffice. And a couple months ago I decided to optimize the Excel sheets at work by incorporating some VBA macros. It’s super useful and I couldn’t find an open source alternative to it that would not run into problems on existing VBA-Excel sheets very, very quickly.

      On the other hand I have photo editing / art programs. For those, I happily hopped from one FOSS to another (GIMP to Krita and I think I had a third one at some point as well) because I actually only need the “basic” and “on the surface” tools of such programs. And so I never even began feeling a pressure to use a closed source program.

  • MJBrune@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The very first FOSS software I used was red hat Linux. My dad brought home a copy of it and left it laying next to our copy of windows. Next time I had to install an OS I found it and tried it. It was terrible. Didn’t do anything I wanted to do. Put windows in the computer.

  • sanzky@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Linux. I think I started playing with it around 2001. I was a computer nerd on high school and I wanted to be a hacker. I would be lying if I said that The Matrix wasn’t a big factor. To this day I use black console with green text.

  • DeadlineX@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My buddy’s mom took his pc as punishment for some nonsense. We cobbled together some parts so he could secretly play an online flash game with me. His frames were seconds behind mine. But we installed Ubuntu on it since we couldn’t afford windows in high school. So I learned about Linux.

  • Lemmchen@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Simply because I haven’t seen it mentioned yet: 7-zip
    But realistically VLC and Firefox

  • privsecfoss@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox and VLC on Windows for years, which just worked. Later XBMC/Kodi and fileserver which where s… on windows but, again, just worked on Linux. When Windows later on kept nagging for something I migrated to 100% Open Source and have been a happy camper ever since!