If we MUST eat a entire bag of Oreos.

Which scenario is better?

  • Eat the entire bag in 30 minutes
  • Eat the bag slowly, and evenly throughout a day?

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Ehhh, I’d say that, on average and for most purposes, spread out is better.

    Less of a hit to your system. No big blood sugar spikes, which reduces the worst aspects if swallowing an entire package to the minimum it gets.

    That being said, expect digestive issues to linger. You’ve got a lot of fats, the coloring, and the sugars playing havoc with your guts.

    Expect to need a lot of tooth brushing unless you just enjoy having plaque and acid build-up messing with your teeth.

    But I’d say that the risks of big spikes in blood sugar are higher than those risks. It could, in the right circumstances, kill you. And the way some of the more recent information regarding the role of sugar in atherosclerosis, and maybe other cardiovascular illness, is looking, every big spike is whittling time off of your heart more than a bunch of little ones will.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I was thinking the opposite. The first one s a huge sugar hit, and every following one.

      • If you spread it out, your body efficiently digests them to maximize the sugar spikes, to maximize the calories absorbed to turn into fat
      • if you do them all in one sitting, you only get one sugar spike and much of the fat and sugar won’t even be digested
    • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      One of the first things I did when I first moved out from my parents is eat a whole bag of Oreos for breakfast because I could.

      It turns your poop black.

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      for most purposes, spread out is better. Less of a hit to your system

      The digestive system is not built for boredom.

      It works best with lots of changes and irregularities. Single events of such stress are no problem at all (only many repeated events of the same stress are bad). The same goes for a day or two of staying hungry.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, but it’s also not meant to process a giant package of processed fats, levels of sugar we haven’t had time to adapt to, or the colorant used that is known to irritate the bowel.

        Which is why folks that go on a cookie spree like that end up constipated or loose and crampy. Which, yeah there’s some folks that would be able to take a giant hit of junk like that without noticing it, but I’ve had to clean up the mess left by Oreos when patients would go crazy on them for one reason or another (often dementia, sadly).

        No, it isn’t going to kill you, or send you to the hospital purely by the digestive side of things, but it can fuck up your day lol.

        Also, you’re misrepresenting not only what I said, but what the digestive tract is “built” for. It doesn’t actually benefit from irregularity of diet. It can handle it, but eating a fairly stable, non irritating diet keeps both the gut flora and the associated hormonal products produced in the intestines at a reliable operation. The more you disturb the system, the less stable the system. When it comes to gut flora and serotonin production in the gut, high sugar intake disrupts in a way that can have lingering effects; anything from a day to a week.

        Don’t mistake the difference between a varied healthy diet and shoving irritants down the pipes. They aren’t the same thing.