Contrary to popular belief, violence actually is the solution in some situations.
Perhaps not this one and there could be an interesting discussion around that, but I fucking hate the idea that violence is never a solution when it absolutely is sometimes.
I still think anyone can do that, just on a smaller scale. Either way, sounds risky. Stocks sometimes go down as it turns out.
Canada. All of the banks I applied at asked for total assets, including TD and Scotiabank.
I’ve never made 6 figures before, but was asked to show my investment portfolio value when applying for a mortgage as it was part of my assets. Assets the bank could seize if I didn’t pay my bill.
TIL I’m the 1%.
Some krill are basically the same size as a grain of rice though.
Do you think you are disagreeing with me?
This only sounds bad for people with a love of beer and donuts.
Admittedly, I am included within that group. But if I wasn’t, I could see supporting such variable rates.
Physical - dry socket
Emotional - nawww I’m good lol
I’m going to use this next time I don’t tip
It’s neither lol, it’s the people themselves.
Blame choosing to drink alcohol or fly a low cost carrier, but like…really it’s you. Sorry.
Can we…stop yelling?
And that’s why boomers are constantly ‘hacked’.
If you don’t want someone else controlling those things, you do indeed need an account. If you are fine with a physical switch to control lights then just stick to that.
Lol it’s probably one of the most famous weather delays in history.
Yes, sort of like gummy bears versus fentanyl.
The way it stands right now, where base wages are not sufficient, is specifically because of tipping. Until people stop tipping, employers will continue to use it to subsidize wages that they should be paying. Whereas if people stopped tipping, the employers could not do that.
The reason they won’t pay is specifically because people tip.
Why would those other medications be more appropriate. What’s the problem with Ketamine in the first place?
To be clear, I’m anti-capitalist and not blaming poor people for anything, nor suggesting they should not have any children. But I stand by my position and wording.
Don’t have more children (or even pets) than one can support. It’s objectively cruel.
Would I prefer a world where there wasn’t such dramatic (or ideally any) inequality? Definitely. But even in a world where every single parent could support 6 kids I’d be against people having 17.
But could he heat up a burrito so hot that even he could not eat it?
If not, that’s pretty weak. But if so, also pretty weak.