Do you think humans can never try something new?
Do you think humans can never try something new?
Great, start with yourself
I don’t think it’s entirely a double standard. Yes Steam is still a launcher, but it’s also the marketplace I buy my games. If I bought a game on Origin or UPlay, and then Steam popped up when I was trying to play my game, that would still be bullshit.
Goddamn woke hipsters smh
Hipster truly means anything huh
Yeah, but like, at least LDS will be forthcoming about how shit is different now. Sure, they kinda dress it up about how the old rules were right “for their time,” but otherwise that’s pretty progressive for a church, IMO.
Compared to JW which will just redact everything they don’t like and pretend it’s always been that way.
LDS is at least upfront about how they change stuff
Theoretically, amendments could be passed to alter the Constitution into anything, if they have support from enough states. Then again, if (theoretically) enough people support a radical change that is prevented because of the outsized influence of some states, how is that democratic?
Yeah, I kinda wish Walz was the candidate instead, based on his progressivism and integrity.
If any sugar soaked beverage is allowed to be marketed as a health drink, that’s a problem that applies to the entire industry.
And drinking 90oz is the fault of the consumer, remember how much blowback there was when New York banned selling drinks above a certain volume? The people want to be able to do drink ungodly amounts of soft drink, apparently.
Only thing I really blame Panera for is not clearly labeling how much caffeine is in a cup, which I also don’t really blame them for because the last time I went to Starbucks or McDonald’s I couldn’t find out which latte had the most caffeine, so that’s standard behavior I guess.
Push for more required disclosure if you’d like, I’d probably agree, but Panera was not out of line IMO.
Also hate seeing the stoner talk about how much safer blazed driving is than drunk driving.
It’s not so caffeinated, it’s about as much caffeine per ounce as coffee
I mean, if it’s between people who didn’t volunteer and people who did, I would have to say it should be the volunteers (US military)
baby you can cry about tone policing all you want, but you are being extremely abrasive which is why people don’t want to talk to you.
You’re not being tone policed, you think you can just act like an asshole if you have a good enough reason.
I met a friend in a chat room that was schizophrenic and loved Anal Cunt
the phrasing didn’t indicate that
the phrasing certainly didn’t indicate that they wish for the abolition of the GOP, you came up with that on your own
"should not be allowed” which implies prohibition.
you’re thinking of “shouldn’t be able” bud, at the end of an election there can only be one party allowed into office
A political party which should not be allowed into office, is what?
the loser, the statement was encouraging a voting position
“everyone I disagree with is trolling”
honey you are seriously reaching if you choose to interpret “should not be allowed into office” as “we must abolish them”
should not vs shall not, ironic telling someone else to practice reading comprehension
Circleflick? Circletoss?