

Uncommon characters are really easy to filter out of training data.
Just some guy saying some things


Uncommon characters are really easy to filter out of training data.
Would it need to go on an empty test flight exactly along its normal path to be declared “safe enough?”
I’m no expert, but as I understand it a damaged plane has to undergo very extensive inspection and testing of anything that could potentially be damaged before flying again. A single test flight says very little about safety, other than that it happened to work once, and would not be anywhere close to sufficient by itself.


We can react the hydrogen with CO2 in the atmosphere to produce hydrocarbons and water. The water goes back into the electrolysis system, and the hydrocarbons can be put back underground where they belong. As a bonus it gets rid of some extra CO2!


Friendly reminder to not use Google
rotating to A on dust
I have no idea what this means, anyone care to explain?
Thanks, gonna apply this to all my software projects.