It’s a political cartoon. The cartoon part is supposed to add something that words couldn’t.
You’re implying this cartoon is good enough to publish which tells me you either haven’t seen many political cartoons or you’re letting your opinion on the message define if it’s good or not.
I think the gold airplane really adds to it, and making it about the twin towers, an event that is solemn and almost untouchable adds to it.
The fact is, if someone has just said, “trump is an airplane, and the Rule of Law/Constitution are the twin towers”, we wouldn’t be here discussing it. The existence of this thread and anaylsis kinda undermines your point that the cartoon didn’t add anything.
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how political cartoons work. It’s a format for making a statement, there is no requirement for it to “add something that words couldn’t”. But even in this case, it does. It adds a direct and visceral comparison between what Trump and his Republican cronies are doing to America and what was felt on 9/11.
It’s a mediocre cartoon. It’s good enough to post on social media but if I’m paying someone to make a cartoon for my paper/website, I’d expect something better than this.
OP says it was rejected for the message being “unfair” and “alarmist”, not for any quality reasons. You are entitled to your opinion, but it doesn’t have any bearing on why it was rejected.
It’s a pretty fucking simple concept, it doesn’t need to be “clever”.
It’s a political cartoon. The cartoon part is supposed to add something that words couldn’t.
You’re implying this cartoon is good enough to publish which tells me you either haven’t seen many political cartoons or you’re letting your opinion on the message define if it’s good or not.
I think the gold airplane really adds to it, and making it about the twin towers, an event that is solemn and almost untouchable adds to it.
The fact is, if someone has just said, “trump is an airplane, and the Rule of Law/Constitution are the twin towers”, we wouldn’t be here discussing it. The existence of this thread and anaylsis kinda undermines your point that the cartoon didn’t add anything.
If I was the artist’s friend and they just pitched that idea to you with that description… I’d suggest workshopping it a bit.
And we’re discussing if it’s a good cartoon, not the content of it.
Yep. Seems like it did add a lot of things. Glad that is cleared up.
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how political cartoons work. It’s a format for making a statement, there is no requirement for it to “add something that words couldn’t”. But even in this case, it does. It adds a direct and visceral comparison between what Trump and his Republican cronies are doing to America and what was felt on 9/11.
It’s a mediocre cartoon. It’s good enough to post on social media but if I’m paying someone to make a cartoon for my paper/website, I’d expect something better than this.
OP says it was rejected for the message being “unfair” and “alarmist”, not for any quality reasons. You are entitled to your opinion, but it doesn’t have any bearing on why it was rejected.
I never claimed otherwise, though. I said I would have rejected it for being bad and all of my comments have been my opinion on why it’s not good.