Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoDouble standardsslrpnk.netimagemessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up1997arrow-down116
arrow-up1981arrow-down1imageDouble standardsslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square129fedilink
minus-squarenull_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down8·3 days agoAre you saying HR will side with the guy making cup cake comments? That’s antithetical to the comment I replied to. It can’t be both.
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoThey literally did. Why are you disregarding her account and acting like this is some kind of hypothetical?
minus-squarenull_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·2 days agoThat’s not what her account said at all. You’re making up a narrative that doesn’t exist.
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 hours agoNo, that’s literally what she said. Get some reading comprehension ffs. HR talked to her instead of the boss who made the rude comment. Read it as many times as you need…
minus-squarenull_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 hours agoSorry mate all the comments in this thread are asserting different things. The screen cap says HR spoke to her. You’re saying that means that they’ve taken the supervisors side. That would expose the company to a legal claim, which is the antithesis of what every other comment here says HR is supposed to do.
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 days agoNo, I’m saying a dumb HR worker won’t rattle the cage in which they sit.
minus-squarenull_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·2 days agoHow can they protect the company they work for if they can’t stave off a cup cake law suit?
Are you saying HR will side with the guy making cup cake comments?
That’s antithetical to the comment I replied to. It can’t be both.
They literally did. Why are you disregarding her account and acting like this is some kind of hypothetical?
That’s not what her account said at all. You’re making up a narrative that doesn’t exist.
No, that’s literally what she said. Get some reading comprehension ffs. HR talked to her instead of the boss who made the rude comment. Read it as many times as you need…
Sorry mate all the comments in this thread are asserting different things.
The screen cap says HR spoke to her.
You’re saying that means that they’ve taken the supervisors side.
That would expose the company to a legal claim, which is the antithesis of what every other comment here says HR is supposed to do.
No, I’m saying a dumb HR worker won’t rattle the cage in which they sit.
How can they protect the company they work for if they can’t stave off a cup cake law suit?