• Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The ancient halo comedy sketch thing? They weren’t still making those, surely?

    Could the advert revenue not be decreasing because fewer people are watching old niche Halo content these days?

    Ah well either way, I wish them the best. Those videos certainly gave me a bit of a chuckle :-)

    • idogoodjob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe I saw they were still making them recently.

      Also they may be talking about ad revenue per view, which would take into account decreased viewership

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the most recent season was supposed to be the last, though they’re sunsetting a lot of things these days (RIP Achievement Hunter) so I could easily be confused.

    • PoetSII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The final season™ is in production now after a couple year hiatus.

      Main storyline ended back in like 2014 iirc, then they had an anthology non-Canon season of a bunch of different animation styles which was really neat, and then like 3 seasons of weird virtual production unreal engine stuff that I don’t think is Canon?

      Either way it’s still being made, but it’s the end. Allegedly.

  • LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    Distributed content is always good, just hope they have a good way to drive traffic to their site.

    Back in the day this was how all Internet content was

  • Defaced@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, this is probably a good move. I think we’re going to see more and more of this happening in the future. Self hosted media platforms that can partner with other streaming services, that’s my guess as to what will happen. Ironically right back to what life was before YouTube, the main difference now is that self hosting is much cheaper and easier these days comparatively.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well you don’t have to spend three hours downloading a 240p .mov file, so its a little different.

  • owatnext@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn. Didn’t realize RvB was still going? I wonder if it is still as funny as I thought it was in high school.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plot got really convoluted and they started doing a lot of homegrown animation instead of sticking with a pure machinima format, but there are still some funny moments here and there from what I recall.

  • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, rather than having some revenue coming in from YouTube, they’d rather force everyone to use their own website? Do they not understand that not everyone watches YouTube on a computer? Some exclusively use the YouTube app on their phones, TVs, or game consoles.

    I dunno. It’s not as if it costs them anything to host the videos on YouTube. Seems odd to completely cut off a revenue source like that.

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      The trouble is, if the have the content on YouTube, people will just watch that - even if RT asks them not to. People will always take the most comfortable path to a goal, if they only host on their site, then anyone who wants to watch their stuff has to go on their apps or their website.

      Basically they’re betting that they have a loyal enough fan base to follow them off YouTube, but recognizing that they won’t do it if they don’t have to. Whether or not their viewership stays is another question, but honestly it’s not that out there. I feel like people have already forgotten that this is how the internet worked for most of its history. Some Gen Z folks are just gonna have to learn how to use more than one app to consume all their content

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We need an RSS-like feed of websites like this that you can watch from a centralized feed. That’d be cool.

        That way you could “subscribe” to a website and have their videos aggregate on to a single video library app, just like how RSS is for content feeds. RSS does not handle video though, and I want to avoid actually going to the source website.

        • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          theoretically they could provide an embedded video link I suppose and the centralized viewer could use that.

          The trouble is that most content creators like RT aren’t going to want that either, because the whole point is that they want to be able to serve ads and whatnot to pay the bills - plus they’d very much prefer people go to their site so that they continue watching RT content, instead of just watching one thing and moving on. Ultimately the “perfect” solution is going to have to strike a middle ground between what consumers want and creators need

          • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s why this solution would also require some sort of standardized advertising integration. I think every provider and content creator would want this. The standardization would of course let them choose the frequency and aggressiveness of the ads, or they just wouldn’t participate altogether.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And also that people fed up with it being missing from YouTube don’t just start reuploading them without permission.

        • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They definetely have the resources to monitor for that and report it - whether or not YouTube acts on the reports is always an open question though

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe they figure they’ll get more revenue per-view through their website, and by removing their videos from YouTube they’ll drive enough new viewers there to make up for the loss.

      Let’s see how that works, I guess.

    • JaymesRS@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Look, I know you don’t know me, but you have to believe what I’m about to tell you. Sometime in your future, I get stationed here in Blood Gulch and we meet. And this guy here, he gets promoted to Sergeant of the red army and we spy on them. And they get this new jeep and I’m all like, “There is no way you can pick up chicks in a tank!”

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah the headline reads like a schizophrenic wrote it.

      I understand they are english words but this makes no sense to me.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Me and a friend were reminiscing about RvB last week and I actually had assumed they just pulled it from YouTube already, guess part of me was just living in the future.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Rooster Teeth has moved some of its popular content, including most Red vs. Blue seasons, off the YouTube platform entirely and onto its own website.

    Rooster Teeth senior writer and showrunner for RWBY Kerry Shawcross posted a video on Thursday announcing the change, explaining that “YouTube revenue is just not cutting it for us right now.”

    Shawcross said Rooster Teeth also moved Camp Camp to the site, where episodes will continue to be ad-supported and free to watch.

    He added Rooster Teeth gets “approximately 5 – 10 times more value” from ads it runs on its own website, adding that “animation’s hard and it’s expensive.”

    He didn’t say specifically what was moved or when, but multiple threads on Reddit from the second half of September say that most of the Red vs. Blue series appeared to have disappeared from YouTube.


    The original article contains 140 words, the summary contains 140 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • fishos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They should post one last video to YouTube that is just Church saying “hhhhhhhnnnnnng… bleh”