• Jamablaya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It came from it not being actually .333 to infinity when measured in the required engineering precision i was talking about. It’s literally a “common use” mathematical convention (you clearly are unaware of) that three times .333 is one. Solves a lot of problems due to a failure of the notation.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        3 times 0.333 is 0.999 not 1.

        Saying it equals 1 may be a common engineering convention, but it is mathematically incorrect.

        There is no failure of notation if fractions are used, which is why I gave this example of usefulness.

        • Jamablaya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You knows when a person informs you of a convention people use to solve a problem created by notation, you could just fucking learn instead of arguing stupidity.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Your chosen notation solves nothing. Try Representing 3227/555 using 4 trailing dots.

            I started here by showing how fractions are useful.

            You are the ignorant aggressor, trying to fight centuries of mathematicians by claiming decimals are always better.