• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The speaker does not have to be a member of Congress. The constitution does not require it.

    So, we go find some figurehead that everyone loves, maybe a medal of honor recipient, astronaut, civil rights pioneer, 9/11 firefighter… Somebody without a political agenda. And instead of letting the Republicans flail until they can finally figure out how to consolidate power within their party, Democrats nominate a truly admirable outsider, and invite the Republicans to reject them.

    Repeat every day with a new candidate until we have a speaker. And whoever they do eventually approve, Democrats can spend the rest of the term comparing them to the string of laudable candidates rejected by Republicans.

    • Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a lot of work being speaker. Not only do you need to know the rules of the House and align subcommittees, you control what goes to the floor.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The majority and minority leader can handle the overwhelming majority of that work. The speaker role could be as a mediator between the two of them.

        The troublesome part is that the speaker is third in the line of succession.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Technically, Nixon was first, Agnew was second, so in a sense, Ford could have been considered number 3. If we ever did get to a true #3, it would be a very comparable to Ford’s presidency.