• Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    A bipartisan solution to the GOP’s leadership chaos still sounds farfetched to most on the Hill — but then, so does the idea that Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) might overcome his dozens of skeptics and win a floor vote early next week.

    • someguy3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So what’s the baggage with Jim Jordan? (I’m just assuming it’s there.)

      • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is not a chance in hell that d’s would vote for him because he’s working for Russia all the time, he’s very loud about it, and has been known to look the other way while his boss raped kids.

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        1 year ago

        Old Jim used to be a coach, and he turned a blind eye to (his assistant?) molesting over a hundred kids.

        He also was deeply involved with Jan 6.

        All he does is yell and ramble.

  • MelodiousFunk@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re like the dog that caught the car it was chasing. All proud of themselves but have no fucking clue what to do with it.

  • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    The escape hatch is to vote for Jeffries. Simple as that.

    But, keep on trying to get a conservative in the house. I’m laughing because that’s all I can do.

    • spider@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      conservative

      Like “freedom”, “patriot”, etc., it no longer means what it used to.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The speaker does not have to be a member of Congress. The constitution does not require it.

    So, we go find some figurehead that everyone loves, maybe a medal of honor recipient, astronaut, civil rights pioneer, 9/11 firefighter… Somebody without a political agenda. And instead of letting the Republicans flail until they can finally figure out how to consolidate power within their party, Democrats nominate a truly admirable outsider, and invite the Republicans to reject them.

    Repeat every day with a new candidate until we have a speaker. And whoever they do eventually approve, Democrats can spend the rest of the term comparing them to the string of laudable candidates rejected by Republicans.

    • Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a lot of work being speaker. Not only do you need to know the rules of the House and align subcommittees, you control what goes to the floor.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The majority and minority leader can handle the overwhelming majority of that work. The speaker role could be as a mediator between the two of them.

        The troublesome part is that the speaker is third in the line of succession.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Technically, Nixon was first, Agnew was second, so in a sense, Ford could have been considered number 3. If we ever did get to a true #3, it would be a very comparable to Ford’s presidency.

  • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m glad it’s only a temporary one, McCarthy proved that they’ll lie and blame.

    Which means that, unless Jordan can overcome his skeptics and push to victory on the floor in the next several days, the only way forward might be with Democrats. A group of centrist Democrats wrote to Acting Speaker Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) on Friday to propose a limited agenda and some perks for the opposing party in exchange for temporarily restarting House business during a time of global crisis.

    • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      a limited agenda and some perks for the opposing party in exchange for temporarily restarting House business

      That sort of extreme self sabotage from a position of strength is QUINTESSENTIAL Dem Leadership! 🤦

        • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, voluntarily giving them control back in exchange for 5 votes is a super way to respond to their dumbassery meaning that they’re 20 or so votes short.

          The Dem leadership is always shooting themselves in the foot and giving the fascist party gifts like this and I’m frankly sick of it.