• bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    RIAA assholes paying more to Spotify and some of that going to the artists isn’t the radical act of rebellion it’s painted to be, but still acceptable.

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Why even use Spotify at all? Isn’t it like the worst option in terms of actually paying creators? Even YouTube Music is much better option imho, although the app is unresponsive and a UX nightmare.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The YouTube music app has always been very snappy and responsive on my phone. I think the ui is slick although not always optimal to navigate while driving.

    • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      While that’s definitely true it’s not like there are any streaming platforms paying artists what they actually deserve. Other streaming services do payout slightly more per stream but they also don’t have the number of paying users Spotify has. So you’re likely going to make more off of spotify than any other service even if they do payout less per stream.

      Not defending spotify though. Them and the record labels are absolute scum. Just making the point that if you want artists to benefit from you listening to their music just buy their music outright. Or go see them live if you can. Don’t stream it. Because streaming pays basically nothing no matter where you stream it from.

    • Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think one of the allures of Spotify is a good algorithm which often recommends niche and small artists according to your taste

      • urandom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Really. For a long time it’s kept giving me songs which I’ve heard a thousand times. I can’t seem to find anything new

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Excess ain’t rebellion.
    You’re drinking what they’re selling.
    Your self-destruction doesn’t hurt them.
    Your chaos won’t convert them.
    They’re so happy to rebuild it.
    You’ll never really kill it.
    Yeah, excess ain’t rebellion.
    You’re drinking what they’re selling.
    Excess ain’t rebellion.
    You’re drinking,
    You’re drinking,
    You’re drinking what they’re selling.

    Rock and Roll Lifestyle

    Spotify loves you for this. And the artists can’t perceive it.

  • Manticore@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    AFAIK this fucks with artists, not Spotify.

    Spotify doesn’t pay artists a flat amount per stream. Instead, Spotify’s profits are split between artists based on their streams. A single user heavily streaming is imperceptibly lowering ‘revenue per stream’ by increasing overall streams but only paying for one subscription.

    By playing a bunch of songs, all you do is give those artists slightly more, and other artists slightly less – at least in theory. In practice you’re probably not steaming enough to change overall percentages.

    So if anything, you are moving profit to support the artists that Spotify is promoting by putting in your ‘radio’. Which likely means instead of going to small undiscovered musicians, it goes towards popular established ones that Spotify assumes you’ll like.

    But since this is probably not enough to move those percentages, you’re only messing up your own algorithm.

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I really thought it said “nutting” instead of “muting”. I was so confused and the photo of Hank Hill did not help with that confusion.

  • Gravitywell@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Why not just stop using spotify? You cant possibly stream enough to cost them more then they earn in a month they earn from you using them. Even on mute they can still count you as an active user when it comes to selling ads and promiting themselves.

    If you really want to hurt spotify, use one of the services like Soundiiz that lets you export your lists and library, grab a 2 month trial of tidal for $2 and point tidal-dl to download it all for offline use. Get yourself a nice dedicated music player like a classic ipod running rockbox. If space is an issue convert from flac to opus.

    If you really, really, want to hurt spotify do what i did and take the above instructions and then also spin up your own FunkWhale pod so everyone can also enjoy that music without giving corporations like spotify a dime.

    We arent going beat corporations by using their products “too much”, the way to beat them is to replace them with self hosted alternatives.

    • trashboat@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is there a good FOSS service for discovering new music based on taste? I hate a lot of the closed-source algorithm BS that corpo apps force users into, but Spotify winds up doing a fair job at finding deep cuts that I enjoy

      • Gravitywell@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well if thats your goal buy their music or merch, or just send them cash directly, most artists are on bandcamp, smaller artists will at least have a venmo or cashapp you can send to.

        Artists arent making their rent money on whatever pittance spotify pays them, you would do more good for the actual artist if you just promoted their work and gave them a few bucks directly.

          • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I’m a big fan of Tidal from my usage thus far, they pay their artists something like 1.3 cents a stream versus 0.3 cents (numbers pulled from my memory and may be slightly off). Plus, the higher audio quality available and the 6 person family plan are nice to have.

      • Gravitywell@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        In theory funkwhale can be private, but no one is going to bother you for having a public one. Mine has been running for 2 years without any takedown requests.

        If enough people started using funkwhale to the point it actually affected spotifys revinue, but as much as i would like for that to happen, i dont think its very likely.

        • dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Is funkwhale lime peertube for music?

          So if I make music, could I upload it to, let’s say, your funkwhale instance and the that would be federated to all funkwhale instances?

          Or is it more like Plex in that, you upload everything to your instance and I can just listen to it?

  • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Revenue is distributed proportionally as a percentage of revenue based on streams relative to other artists, not per stream

    • TachyonTele@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Do your cats have any favorite? I’ve noticed whenever i play alice in chains or type o negative my cat sits next to me and looks at the speaker.

      • Doom@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        They never seem to care but I listen to pretty chill stuff, Mitski, Courtney Barnett, Lucy Dacus. They probably just fall asleep