• takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    They weren’t sent to LA to say protesters. They were sent to intimidate and test if they can similarly deploy them to other states.

    They don’t really have much to do here anyway.

    Oh and to summarize. Together with NG that’s nearly 5,000 troops. The protest (which was already under control by the time troops arrived) had 1,000 people and was contained within 5 blocks of the city.

    The protest was just excuse.

  • There’s a reason it’s not the Trump Administration but the Trump Regime. He’s using federal resources not to execute the law and perpetuate national services, but to serve his own interests. Trump is not enacting the duties of the office, but instead is looking to profit personally from his powers.

    The White House has literally gone rogue, and is not at all engaging the responsibilities of government.

    Think of him and his staff as organized embezzlers.

  • CatZoomies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The key thing to call out is those L.A. protesters were peaceful and orderly. They remained calm even while being attacked by Trump’s goons. There were no fights and no murders. They protested civilly, and employed civil disobedience and organisation.

    They are not completely non-violent though, as a handful did damage property by setting fire to Waymo’s (equipped with police surveillance). But that does not apply to all the protesters as, if I recall correctly, they had a massive turnout. Only a handful destroyed property.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Just want to clarify, Waymo was using their camera tech to give the police protestor information yo arrest people. They didnt just get a little too rowdy and set a car on fire, it was an act of self preservation to further their protest. Its important to put that in context, and not just throw that out there like people were just being hooligans.

      • CatZoomies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Appreciate you adding that clarification. It was a while ago so I totally forgot about Waymo doing that!

        It’s been… a really long year. Another 3.5 more to go.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Remember, midterms in 1.5. They could let us stop most of this.

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Another 3.5 more to go.

          An optimist, I see. I truly hope that ends up being the worst case scenario.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Property destruction of an individual owner’s (e.g house they depend on) is violence, if it poses damage to the family that lives there.
        Destruction of corporate property is not.
        The funny part is the cops only ever respond to one of these types of damage. Take a guess which.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      We need to stop referring to people as “violent” for damaging the means of oppression. Also people might technically be violent if they defend themselves against violent attacks by the authorities, but that again should not be accepted as a framing.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Because they want to protect government and power … not people … people don’t matter … money and power does