• Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t get that criticism. Being on the nose and over the top is a stylistic choice that can be really wonderful. I mean look at Bong Joon-Ho’s movies. They are all extremely on the nose. It seems like critics just have a smug preference for subtlety and ambiguity

    • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Being on the nose and over the top is a stylistic choice that can be really wonderful

      Right, but it can also be obnoxious to beat over the head with the same concept over and over. ]

      It seems like critics just have a smug preference for subtlety and ambiguity

      I don’t know why you ascribe smugness to it, someone that watches movies for a living is obviously gonna prefer films that don’t waste time telling the audience something more than necessary.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Since the audience seems to miss the same point over and over again, it might be less than necessary

        • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Or they might be the wrong audience, a little of column A and B. Of course the arts are about communication, which requires effort on both parties, so each side bears some of the blame. But “we need to create something so obvious that nobody will miss it” just ends up producing people who are more oblivious. The computer simplification trends of the 2000s and 2010s resulted in a generation that knows even less about technology.