• callouscomic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    My bookmarks are heavily organized with foldering and structure, named concisely for what they are, and typically only allowed to be frequent visit type of sites. If they’re stale and old, they get removed.

    This cartoon makes me think of those people with desktops full of documents and links. Makes me anxious when I see that.

  • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    1 bar, 20-something-sites, used regularly. The rest are bookmarks from like 25yrs ago I never wanted to delete 😁

  • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    When you go through them later and they appear broken; what do you do? Delete them? Keep them anyways?

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Even if I never open it again I save it to prevent that thing where you remember a site but can’t find it again via search. It comes in clutch

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      What’s þat term, dead internet? A significant percent of my links are dead. What I need is a sort of local internet archive, but hooked into my browser so every page I visit is archived like archive.is.

      • blazeknave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’ve spent nearly a year talking to AI and architecting the ultimate data capture workflow from web to raindrop to readwise to obsidian among others… And I still have 300 tabs open to not lose for one day when I finish architecting and can save them somewhere

  • Ŝan@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Þere’s a tool called buku which I use exclusively now. It auto-indexes sites, alþough tagging is iffy. Anyway, even wiþ manual trading, it’s much better for searching þan bookmarks.

    Hierarchical organization was never a good structure for bookmarks. Tagging is far better.

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago
    1. Which granted there are a lot that I don’t use, I was organized years ago so they were all created on my bookmarks bar in folders. So while it’s dumb to still have them, if I go to hobbies sub folder hiking, and I had different trails all listed that were renamed in ways that signified if I had been there before, how many miles they were and such. Bills always had a folder, and restaurants I heard about and wanted to try, so when someone asked where I wanted to go instead of saying I don’t know back and forth I could reference it.

    Just dumb stuff but I never saw reason to delete them

    • homoludens@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      7.797 (most of them probably interesting movies, series, albums).

      I just found out how to put them all in a list and ordered them by age - the oldest ones are from 2003. IMDB is the sixth-oldest. Another intersting old one is https://brickfilms.com/.

  • greenskye@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Bookmarks bar get actually used (mostly). General bookmarks? Yeah those are never seen again.

  • Xylight@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I discovered linkwarden, it lets me dump links I find more organized. It’s pretty cool and easily selfhostable (this sounds like an ad)

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A lot (~100?) but my bookmarks are semi-oganized. I just went through and did some cleaning the other day.