• Amuletta@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      This is in central Saskatchewan. Presumably those southwest roofs are flat - this isn’t.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Low slope, so considered flat for most codes, can’t use shingles. Basically every commercial roof has rocks, but In the last decade they’ve shifted to a vinyl. Lighter, handles more snow load.

        • Amuletta@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          They probably could use shingles, there are plenty of surrounding houses with about the same pitch that do.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            From one to next they look really similar.

            2:12 is low slope iirc. So 3:12 can use shingles, but not 2:12.

            You’re right though, could just be a look choice on a higher slope. Could be a “trial” roof or something who knows.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Weird. I would assume that rocks would be problematic for snow and would just encourage snow to stick and add street to the framing.

        The only rock roofs I’ve ever come across are in temperate places that don’t get snow.