• Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    I get the insecure argument about tap cards (don’t agree but I get it), but how could chip cards possibly be considered more insecure than swiping? That makes no sense.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      from a tech-oblivious standpoint, there is no difference between the two.

      …oh wait you guys didn’t do swipe+pin did you

      • despoticruin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sort of. We did, it was just never mandatory and could almost always be charged on just a swipe. We got chip and pin about 15 years ago now, but they again didn’t make it mandatory, so they kept the stripe. Honestly if they just got rid of the swipe we would be fine, but not every retailer has tap to pay and not every bank does chips yet.

        It’s a mess. The tech is there, fucking old people and idiots keep the stripe on the cards and because of that skimmers run rampant.

        • jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I am annoyed many banks got rid of the raised numbers, at least one store I went to (less than 5 years ago) lacked internet and phone connectivity, now they have to write the numbers by hand.