And that’s the story of why I switched to Arch <3
Obligatory Ubuntu sucks message

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    LIN 👏

    NUX 👏

    MINT 👏

    I’ve seen plenty of Debian mentions, and no pushback there whatsoever from me.

    But if you find yourself frustrated that you can’t just have Ubuntu without Canonical’s snaps and ads and other ickiness, Mint is exactly that. Or maybe better, I dunno. It’s super polished and full featured and stable.

    And even better in this era of Windows 10 support ending, the main/default version (Linux Mint Cinnamon) looks like Windows out of the box but it installs, works, and updates at like 10x the speed. (The 10x is an exaggeration for moment to moment desktop work and latency, but for the install and especially for updates I think it’s accurate)

  • Newsteinleo@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am literally running Ubuntu right now and I don’t get this comic. I have never been asked to subscribe to Ubuntu Pro, if I have it was noninvasive that I didn’t notice.

    • highball@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s only LTS. Desktop users rarely use LTS. Great to have live kernel updates on a developer workstation and servers though.

      • Newsteinleo@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Thank you for educating me, but this makes less sense now. The only people who should/need to run LTS are people we a specific reason for staying on an older OS. And if that’s the case you should no what you are getting into.

        • highball@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Exactly, it’s just people finding an excuse to complain about. It’s more like an extension of the Unix wars or the editor wars or the browser wars. People have to find a reason to justify their choice.

      • droans@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Okay, sure, but how often does it spam ads?

        Does it keep asking me to register for something that either shouldn’t need registering or exist at all? Does it tell me to subscribe for a service every time I open up the terminal?

        We all need one or two ads, as a treat.

    • Auth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I just dont feel safe without a random corporate office worker having full access to my device.

  • B-TR3E@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Did you know “Ubuntu” is Swaheli for “can’t get Debian installed”?

  • Wilmo Bones@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The thing about Ubuntu that kills me (as a user of it) is the other users who comment on reddit/r/Ubuntu.

    They are so confidentally incorrect about so much shit.

    Talk about removing snaps?

    “Core gnome functionality on Ubuntu requires snaps”

    That’s not even remotely true. Snaps download Gnome* runtime libraries for it, just like Flatpaks do to run the snaps.

    Just an example but still. I see so much crap like this.

    • highball@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, it’s the Cognitive Bias fallacy. Reminds me of all the anti Linux users who continue using the “Linux wont be ready for the average user, because no average user wants to write a compiler from scratch just so they can compile their programs”. If you don’t like something, you don’t like it. No problem, no reason to whine and cry about it. You like a different distro, great, go use it. That’s how distro’s work. Everything eventually helps everybody and you just pick a distro that gets you close to what you want. I started with Slackware 3.4, to me everything is great.

      • Nikls94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        A friend of mine is a computer illiterate. His laptop doesn’t support Win11 because of the missing secure boot.

        I installed Linux mint and showed him firefox, but he preferred chrome, so I got him Brave. Steam was downloaded, the update center was self explanatory.

        He loves the speed.

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Why would you install Brave when he liked chrome? You could have gone with any other non crypto bro non ad company chrome fork.

          Basic Chromium would have been better.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wow, who would have thought the entry level linux distro might be full of inexperienced people who have no idea what they’re talking about.

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I really hate all these snaps and flatpacks and docker and blah blah blah.

      Its about impossible to find a simple series of commands to just install and run some program anymore.

      I also keep running into issues, especially with Docker where it assumes its the only thing that exists and everything uses the same port.

      • dai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Run a macvlan and give containers their own local IP. Or don’t expose the port on the host, and connect via reverse proxy.

    • Archer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Proxmox devs are so close to making it a nice experience for homelabbers but they just leave a fresh install mangled so badly you need a helper script to give you sane settings. Not to mention if you make an Ubuntu vm with default settings it won’t boot. Plus the Linux user elitism on the forums. I want to like it more so much

      • bruhduh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Preach, in using proxmox myself but they still haven’t fixed bug when you install it from ventoy it tries to boot system from ventoy when system already installed on main drive, resulting in kernel panic, this bug still persists since 8.* Versions, and i have to fix it manually every time i install proxmox on another second hand pc/laptop for my homelab, for people who think it’s ventoy issue i write that i didn’t have this bug with any other distro, not even with god forsaken manjaro didn’t had this bug when i tried it three years ago

    • wetsoggybread@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you’re using proxmox in a production environment and making money it doesn’t cost much at all compared to VMware. I see it as helping fund production of software that right now still seems very solid

  • udon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Intolerable, scammy OS. Everything good in Ubuntu these days can be traced back to other projects, such as debian/Gnome/KDE. Whatever Canonical adds to that is just an attempt to lock you in their ecosystem or wring money out of you.

    Just use debian instead.

    • somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Or mint, if you’re a newbie

      Honestly, i don’t like debian and it’s derivatives because they focus on stability, and that means packages in the repos get outdated really quick. I’d love a distro that combines a debian base and the rolling release model of arch.

      • guynamedzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I know it’s not exactly what you’re asking for but fedora is reaaaally nice. I don’t think I’ve had a single “unstable” package and it’s kept up to date really well. The only concern I have with it is red hat, I’m just hoping they don’t decide to enshittify

        • somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          True, fedora is both up to date and stable. The main reason i came to arch anyways was the AUR, ArchWiki and the need to spice things up a bit. I also like how customizable the whole distro is. Because it’s basically a house’s materials and the blueprint, i can make whatever the hell i want to it :)

        • ThunderLegend@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ve been using Fedora for 3 years now…loved the dnf way of dealing with packages and the upgrades were painless…the only thing that bothers me is my nvidia card…I have issues with games on steam and every update seems to mess with the nvidia kernel module somehow…so…

          • Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            What issue? I switched a friend to fedora KDE wayland and installed the rpmfusion drivers and it’s been fine (40 series)

            • ThunderLegend@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              They’re mostly issues with steam and games… Steam app does not launch with the dedicated GPU…same with games…once I force it to use the nvidia card, games get worse and some of them don’t even launch… Same games I used to play when I had Ubuntu on my machine (my dell laptop came with Ubuntu 18.04 pre installed)

          • lightnegative@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Im in the same boat and I regret buying NVIDIA.

            I’m not a gamer but NVIDIA issues rear their head on Wayland mostly for things that need 3D rendering like Bambu Studio and even Electron apps like Slack, Spotify and VSCode.

            Oh and also trying to get hardware video decoding working on Firefox is a pain. I’m now at the point where full screening a video just causes Firefox to immediately crash.

            Definitely getting AMD next time but I’m a long ways off upgrading my NUC, it’s 8 core i7 with 64gb of ram so will serve my dev needs for a long time

          • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            If you’re using Linux for gaming, why not try Bazzite? It’s immutable, which is… Contentious. But it’s one of the best plug-and-play distros for gaming, with Nvidia support right out of the box.

            • ThunderLegend@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m not just using it for gaming…I use it mostly for work … but I wanted to play a game or two eventually…that’s why I picked a general distro like fedora

      • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can always use sid. Or debian stable but you do everything that needs bleeding edge in a distrobox.

      • udon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        True, the apt packages can get outdated (or are already outdated at release time :) ). But tbh, for me that mainly affects the desktop environment these days and KDE is already pretty neat anyway. The CLI tools I use don’t change as much anymore, and the GUI tools are usually available as a flatpak so up-to-date.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That has ALWAYS been the case. I dont know why people are surprised now… ubuntu has alqays been backed by canonical. And it has always been based on the work of debian. What did people expect?

      People have always been saying to just skip the corporate bullshit and go straight to the source… debian

      Unfortunately there was a very loud group of people online shitting on debian, saying that it’s too difficult or user friendly or whatever… may have been true 10 years ago, but not anymore

      • clif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I just set up a new home lab server and my first instinct was the latest Debian.

        … Seemed fine to me.

    • kinther@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I haven’t given them anything and have been using desktop for almost 3 years now. I run Ubuntu server at work without any issues either. I signed up for pro for free on my home desktop and didnt have to pay anything.

      Where do they attempt to get money from me? Asking because I’m legitimately not sure.

    • Maestro@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, all the good parts of Ubuntu have been backported to Debian years ago.

        • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Better out-of-the-box hardware support, in my experience. We have a machine learning server at work, it didn’t see the GPUs on Debian Bullseye with the driver versions specified by the manufacturer, but worked perfectly with Ubuntu Server out of the box.

          A distribution that is preconfigured by professionals has great value in a practical setting, even if that value has diminished in the eyes of the kind of person that Lemmy attracts. If I had tried to get Debian working by overruling the manufacturer’s instructions, I’d have to take responsibility for it, both its maintenance and the downtime and potential damage if I had fucked something up. With Ubuntu, I get to delegate at least part of the responsibility to Canonical (while covering my own ass), and that’s something you can’t backport.

        • mogoh@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t know what Maestro is referring to, but Ubuntu has really good out of the box hardware support. Also it streamlined the installation process. Start it as a live CD, look around, if you like it, install it from the live environment. Generally they improved usability.

          • lauha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Live graphical installation and live environment has been a thing on fedora, suse, mandrake and a lot of distros since early 2000s. Ubuntu didn’t invent that.

            • mogoh@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I thought Ubuntu was one of the first. Something arround 2005. I am not sure though.

    • CubitOom@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m not afraid of Ubuntu, I’m afraid of the need to use the the Ubuntu forums when I have an issue.

      I use arch wiki btw.

      • moonburster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        I recently switched to Eos and the arch wiki came in clutch many times (don’t try to an arch based system on a Mac without reading a ton of documentation, I learned that the hard way).

        Only Ubuntu I’ve seen rtfm more than actually helpful commands

        • Linearity@piefed.auOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Really? All Linux installations worked just fine on my 2017 Air
          Perhaps yours is an older model?

          • moonburster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            It is indeed a bit older, 2015 pro. Most issues were with the WiFi (bcm46302 is a terrible chip omfg).

            Besides that just some reverse engineered drivers for thermal management, but setting those up was more annoying on mint than on arch

  • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is why I switched back to Debian Stable on my servers, can’t deal with this shit.

    Also the fact that if you’re not up to date on updates, you can go fuck yourself as far as Ubuntu is considered. Debian will let you upgrade from any version without complaints

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep 100%. Ubuntu did this once, googled it, and said aloud “Ah hell no!! …” Between this and Snaps I was like ok I’m done. Started researching things like Mint and PopOs. Decided to just stick with Debian. Especially since ProxMox is basically just specialized Debian designed for KVM virtualization.

      Yeah I also had a similar problem with updates. Had an old Ubuntu vm that I could not get to upgrade without lots of pain. It’s like they were trying to piss me off.

  • Aetherion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I currently try Bazzite, which is a gaming focused fedora-atomic spinoff. I think this is finally my distro to switch the desktop from windows.

  • Albbi@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I love how in Garuda linux, the same command as sudo apt update;sudo apt upgrade is just yay. Like “Yay, I’m upgrading my system!” Makes me happy when I run it even though it is a bit like pulling a slot machine lever for if it’s going to break something in my system. My plasmashell environment only recently got fixed. It was crashing like crazy for about 2 weeks.

  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t recall ever seeing such an ad in Ubuntu. Totally possible I wasn’t paying attention or I saw it and forgot.

    • highball@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s for LTS releases only. So you rarely see it on desktop, but for sure will see it on servers. My previous job, I ran LTS on my work laptop and would laugh at everyone always getting a forced update right before scrum. This new job, I have to use WSL on this Windows laptop and guess what, I’m in forced update hell. I can understand that for some(or most) the pro message would be annoying, but I’d rather see that pro message 100 times a day then get a forced update at random times. Especially right before meetings.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hi. I’m a sysadmin as part of my day job.

        I’m here to tell you that there’s a local group policy that will, with almost 100% certainty, override the policies set by active directory.

        The issue is that you need to be a local admin to change those settings. If your IT department was smart enough (or dumb enough, depending on your perspective) to give you local admin, then it’s possible to go in and change settings that will give you control again.

        There’s more settings than I can reasonably put into a Lemmy message, but I’m certain you can use your favorite search engine to find “local group policy settings for Windows update” and adjust them to your liking.

        There’s a lot of nuance when it comes to this stuff, and I can’t guarantee the outcome. No matter what, good luck with it.

        • highball@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Thanks for the info. If I ever get upgraded security privileges, I’ll be sure to look for it.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It came up once at the initial install and once when I used the shell, then never bothered me ever again iirc.

      Why won’t they leave me alone!

    • Linearity@piefed.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Last I used Ubuntu you do indeed get an ad every time you apt upgrade You can still go into some config file and remove it though

      • Wilmo Bones@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        When was the last time you used Ubuntu though?

        Some people could say “last time I used Ubuntu it was full of Amazon ads!” But that would have been like 13 years ago

    • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m an ubuntu user and it was like that for a brief period but then they removed it after an uproar. I think. I double check it once I’m at my laptop

      • BootLoop@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I got a ThinkPad with Ubuntu 24.04 preinstalled and I haven’t seen a single Ubuntu Pro ad. But I saw them a lot on my old laptop with 22 installed. So either they’ve changed their ways or I suppose it’s possible Lenovo has preconfigured some settings.

        Edit. 24.04 LTS

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty sure my work laptop tells me every time that I’m not getting some security upgrades, because I’m not using Ubuntu Pro.

      I believe, there’s some semi-reasonable justification, that they’re only holding back upgrades for packages which they wouldn’t normally maintain anymore, but yeah, it still looks horrendous from an end-user perspective.

    • highball@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just on LTS. Desktop users would only run LTS for 6 months or so. Right, and LTS only releases once every two years. I used LTS on my work laptop at my previous company. Great feature, but I can see it wouldn’t be as necessary for the end users. Hey, when everything is great, women have to find something to nit pick, am I right?!

  • nuggie_ss@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Stuff like that is a major reason why I switched to Debian on my servers.

    The abusive bullshit needs to stop.