• hornywarthogfart@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    We won’t ever know for sure but treating the contradictions in the Bible as intentional is probably giving more credit to the people who initially created it than they deserve.

    More likely, they just just didn’t really plan it out and instead shit was added piecemeal over time ultimately leaving a lot of contradictions.

    Anyways, it seems much more likely that this happened organically rather than being intentional.

    • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Apologetics is a core function of Christianity, and there is plenty of evidence suggesting entire books were rewritten to serve a specific narrative. If they believed the ends justified the means, they absolutely would add contradictions, even if they believed they were sincere in their actions. Just as Christians today still continue to add their own beliefs to the existing literature.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah that’s fair, I suppose saying it’s on purpose would require some proof to back up that claim. I think the important part of my point though is that religious people use the contradictions in their books to commit atrocities. Thank you for your nuanced take, hornywarthogfart