So I just read Bill Gates’ 1976 Open Letter To Hobbyists, in which he whines about not making more money from his software. You know, instead of being proud of making software that people wanted to use. And then the bastard went on and made proprietary licences for software the industry standard, holding back innovation and freedom for decades. What a douche canoe.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      ai is the rich stealing from us, piracy is usually us taking it from the rich.

      • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        AI is theft in the same way that all private property theft. It isnt the piracy of media, it’s the alienation of labor from its product, and withholding it for profit.

              • KittyJynx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                There is some disagreement between people who, for example, favor Proudhon versus those who favor Kropotkin over the ownership of personal tools that are involved in individual trade-craft. As with any ideology there are varying schools of thought but the common ideological baseline is that anything that requires capital investment should be collectively controlled and operated for the common good. A person’s personal possessions including their home and tools required for self sufficiency are not considered “property” or a “means of production” by almost anyone.

                A good real world example is the FOSS community, most of us would be quite vexed to say the least if someone started changing stuff on our personal computers but we also actively share our code, experience, and knowledge with the world for free. Same goes for the open hardware folks, permacomputing community, and the open research community.

                • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Yet none of that can be interpreted as “all property is theft” unless you redefine what “property” itself means which is a terrible strategy for advertising Anarchy.

            • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              quotes a concept about property from 1850s

              Lmao sorry for not being able to take this seriously

              • Seoun (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                You should recognise that meanings of words might not always match your inner dictionary. “Private Property” is used differently from “Personal Property” in a lot of places.