• kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Im not familiar with their work but they sound like a slop developer who tried to publish a game with messed up content and is now whining about not being able to sell it

    (Edit: I looked into them, they are absolutely not an award winning indie studio and def not one of the best, they’re a slop factory and they make asset flip low quality horror games)

  • boringbisexual@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m tired of this headline. An indie studio that hardly anyone has ever heard of tried to push their questionable game. Valve said no…and did so with a solid enough reason from what I’ve learned about it. This is just stupid.

  • Deyis@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    . . . it’s about to venture into even stranger, darker territory with Horses, an unsettling first-person narrative horror adventure set on a farm whose livestock consists of naked masked humans.

    “While we strive to ship most titles submitted to us,” Steam’s automated response read, “we found that this title features themes, imagery, or descriptions that we won’t distribute. Regardless of a developer’s intentions with their product, we will not distribute content that appears, in our judgment, to depict sexual conduct involving a minor. While every product submitted is unique, if your product features this representation—even in a subtle way that could be defined as a ‘grey area’—it will be rejected by Steam.”

    . . . the studio now suspects a work-in-progress scene from day six of Horses’ narrative (the game follows the player across 14 days as they work as a hired hand on the farm where the “horses” are held) might be the culprit. In the early build reviewed by Valve, day six featured a scene in which a man and his young daughter visit the farm. The daughter wants to ride one of the horses, resulting in an interactive dialogue sequence where the girl rides on the shoulders of a naked “horse” while it’s led by the player. “The scene is not sexual in any way,” the studio notes in its FAQ, “but it is possible that the juxtaposition is what triggered the flag.”

    . . . notably, the final version of Horses has been reviewed and approved for distribution across numerous other PC storefronts, including the Epic Games Store, GOG, the Humble Store, and Itch.io. And while Horses won’t be launching on consoles due to porting costs, Pietro says the console makers who’ve seen Horses have said they’d be “happy to have the game on [their] platform”.

    From the description of the scene which seems to have triggered the refusal to platform the game, the studio probably pushed the envelope too far.

      • Deyis@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Even rating it X/AO/Whatever, calling a sequence where a young child rides around on a naked masked person who is forced to comply “contentious” is putting it mildly.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          yeah but thats the point of X. its not R. I mean clock work orange is all kinds of effed up but its a great movie. X means graphic sex, or violence, or worse. I think they had another designation at some point that was like super X but I think folks never really paid attention to it.

          • Deyis@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Have an X rating doesn’t absolve you of criticism or protect you from backlash when you include a sequence involving a naked adult and a child.

              • Deyis@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Sure but you must realise that if Steam were to platform a game featuring a child riding a naked adult in a horse mask, a sequence that the devs have removed in order to have the game on any platform for sale at all, Steam would face a significant amount of backlash and potential legal action for doing so. Why should Steam be obligated to publish a game?

                • HubertManne@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I don’t think obligated as much as they should not be concerned and there should be no backlash to them for stocking it as long as its separated appropriately. Video storms had porn rooms in the back of the store with some signage and people seemed to be able to handle it and get its an adult thing. Heck maybe even have a second but related steam.XXX site where you have to do bullshit verification to peruse. Then require any game that goes over some threshold of whatever to only be visible there. people can login with their steam accounts and have them connected provided they jump the additional hoops. these things are not impossible to work with.