cm0002@no.lastname.nz to Funny@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 5 months agoCatch 22lemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up1137arrow-down10
arrow-up1137arrow-down1external-linkCatch 22lemmy.mlcm0002@no.lastname.nz to Funny@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square4linkfedilink
minus-squareWolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·5 months agoYou are supposed to cite your own relevant work and this sounds like he may have not
minus-squareSumocat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoDouble-blind review masks the author’s identity, including self-citations that would identify the author. The author may have done this too effectively, and/or the reviewer was not as familiar with the author’s work as the critique would imply.
You are supposed to cite your own relevant work and this sounds like he may have not
Double-blind review masks the author’s identity, including self-citations that would identify the author. The author may have done this too effectively, and/or the reviewer was not as familiar with the author’s work as the critique would imply.