You must log in or # to comment.
You are supposed to cite your own relevant work and this sounds like he may have not
Double-blind review masks the author’s identity, including self-citations that would identify the author. The author may have done this too effectively, and/or the reviewer was not as familiar with the author’s work as the critique would imply.
What are the odds. Of that name, I mean.
At least it’s not Plagiarini
