• ivanafterall@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Since there aren’t any spider scientists present, I’ll take a stab at it:

      This is probably some kind of bullshit oversimplification. There was probably like one study by some professor who loves LSD and spiders at a small rural college in New Zealand who published a paper in Spider Science Journal. And it’s not singing so much as some very complex and scientific spider stuff that I won’t bore you with.

      Hopefully I’m just cynical and wrong and there’s a little spider Pavarotti out there.

      • lol3droflxp@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That pretty much hits the nail on the head. Most of this X does “human like™️” stuff Y is anthropomorphism par excellence. Usually some form of instinctual behaviour or even simple results of basic physiological processes are compared to stuff that humans do as a high level cognitive process (singing, talking, etc.) so that it generates clicks and draws attention.
        This paints a completely wrong picture of animal (or even plant) behaviour, spreads misinformation and overshadows the actually interesting scientific discoveries.