• Arelin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      How so? Cuba has one of the most open democracies in the world. Plus free healthcare, no homelessness, and enough free high level education to provide Italy with doctors during the pandemic.

      All while the world’s current top superpower is right beside them, sees them as an enemy, and has a still ongoing embargo on them for 60 years now to prevent them from trading with other countries. That’ll hopefully change once China’s Belt and Road Initiative is complete though.

      Clearly this model works. It does require expelling landleeches, plantation owners and billionaires if they don’t hand over the means of production to the workers (like Cuba did after the revolution), but I don’t think most people would mind that.

      It also historically requires fighting off the US though because military, oil, and other private corporation owners can’t exploit Socialist countries as much, which is harder.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      People always say this and then fail to provide a single example of when proper socialism existed and then destroyed the country.

        • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Communism without actually sharing isn’t communism. Democracy without fair elections isn’t democracy. Socialism without the socialisation of the benefit of production is not socialism. Your ignorance of these things doesn’t change what they are.

            • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              No. The theory when applied doesn’t follow the book. The difference is something called contextual nuance, and you have no grasp of it.

              Your position is like North Korea claiming democracy doesn’t work because they say they are one and it’s not working.