0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoFuck-up Assessment Formsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up152arrow-down10
arrow-up152arrow-down1imageFuck-up Assessment Formsh.itjust.works0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squareMidnight Wolf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoWhat’s wrong with btrfs?
minus-square°˖✧ ipha ✧˖°@lemm.eecakelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 months agoThis is a rather old form and in its early days btrfs was not very stable.
minus-squareSpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoMy only gripe with btrfs is that I’ve had systems come down from a single drive failure in raid quite “often” when compared to other FS. ZFS is a ram hog but I always could do a live resilvering without downtime.
minus-squarehersh@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agobtrfs’s RAID features are not production-ready, and at this point I doubt they ever will be. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#Implemented_but_not_recommended_for_production_use https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Btrfs https://www.phoronix.com/news/Btrfs-Warning-RAID5-RAID6 ZFS is definitely more robust.
minus-squareSpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoIt is true for raid 5 & 6. Raid 0, 1, and 10 are supposed to be production ready. I use raid 10 only with btrfs, anything else and I use zfs or mdadm.
minus-square0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoPeople don’t know how CoW FSes work 🤷.
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-211 months agoperformance opening programs was noticeably slower for me benchmarks confirm this, and I think this is an aspect not discussed often enough
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoI benchmarked it and it blew XFS out of the water
What’s wrong with btrfs?
This is a rather old form and in its early days btrfs was not very stable.
My only gripe with btrfs is that I’ve had systems come down from a single drive failure in raid quite “often” when compared to other FS.
ZFS is a ram hog but I always could do a live resilvering without downtime.
btrfs’s RAID features are not production-ready, and at this point I doubt they ever will be. See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#Implemented_but_not_recommended_for_production_use
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Btrfs
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Btrfs-Warning-RAID5-RAID6
ZFS is definitely more robust.
It is true for raid 5 & 6. Raid 0, 1, and 10 are supposed to be production ready. I use raid 10 only with btrfs, anything else and I use zfs or mdadm.
Nothing these days
People don’t know how CoW FSes work 🤷.
performance
opening programs was noticeably slower for me
benchmarks confirm this, and I think this is an aspect not discussed often enough
I benchmarked it and it blew XFS out of the water