BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 9 months agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down12
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square99fedilink
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoMy point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoAnd how does that relate to angels?
My point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
And how does that relate to angels?