BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square115fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down12
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square115fedilink
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoMy point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAnd how does that relate to angels?
My point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
And how does that relate to angels?