BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 months agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down12
arrow-up1-1arrow-down1imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square99fedilink
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoIt’s the other side of the same coin. They both argue about the well-being/bad-being of hypothetical humans. It’s bogus, either way.
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoThey are not related because you have to exist to experience well-being or “bad-being”. What I’m talking about is consenting to exist.
It’s the other side of the same coin. They both argue about the well-being/bad-being of hypothetical humans. It’s bogus, either way.
They are not related because you have to exist to experience well-being or “bad-being”. What I’m talking about is consenting to exist.