I’m thinking about upgrading my W-Fi and I was curious what wireless access points (WAP) people are using. I’m currently using a Netgear R7800 running OpenWRT.

  • Pax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    Went all in with UniFi some time back. No regrets.

    Currently running a few U6s. No real motivation to upgrade to U7s.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      While expensive, UniFi hardware is just a huge step beyond the rest of the consumer market.

      I’ve had literally 10x the range (5x vs 50m), in congested environments, compared to ‘gaming’ hardware. I actually did a side by side to test. I was shocked at the difference.

      The bridging function is also a life saver. 2 LR units can get a reliable signal between each other, at ridiculous ranges.

    • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      +1 on this. Though i picked up 2 u7’s. VLAN support, easy to maintain and lets face it, superior function from most retail APs. If you’re a power user, this is the way.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Unifi. I’ve got a box of APs as ewaste just sitting in the basement. Every so often I would get more ewaste from companies I work with.

    I don’t need the most demanding of wifi systems. I hardwire most of my stuff whenever possible. And I have a fairly small home. A single AP on the main floor, 1 AP on the basement. 1 AP in the detached garage.

    Most of my wifi devices are iot things on their own vlan.

  • thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fritzbox boxes.

    They tick all the checkboxes

    • good standards support (including dect protocol if you want to have an ip phone or even iot protocols)
    • fast wifi speeds
    • cheap (at least for the second hand in ebay)
    • super stable, never had a problem with them in 5 years or more
    • fast roaming support out of the box

    It is a well known brand in Germany but pretty unknown outside that country. Honestly it is the best bang for buck I was able to get.

    Honestly, I would spend 10 minutes checking on them

    • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      I really like them but they do have two downsides for “more advanced” users (or at least for me) - it is a home device as after all.

      1. No support for VLAN or VLAN tagging - you can set up you WiFi and a guest WiFi. You can also map the guest network to an Ethernet port. But that’s about it.
      2. There is no way to change the DNS suffix (*. fritz.box) to another value - I do own a domain that I use for the local services on my home server, etc. which then allows for Let’s Encrypt certificates, but I cannot use it “out of the box”.

      If you’re an advanced user, there’s plenty of ways around that, though. I just wished that these two thing were to exist in the firmware to have less work with my home infrastructure.

      • thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Totally agree with the first point, it is a limitation, and the guest wifi sticking to a eth port is just a patch. One that works but still a patch.

        But I don’t see the point of the prefixes. What do you mean? I also have a custom domain and a local dns server y can use the domain even internally. I just simple ignore that…

        • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, I’m also using a local resolver. But since I had some problems using another DHCP server (which was probably a problem on my end), so I’m current setting some devices in my FRITZ!box to a fixed IP and then enter that in my DNS server. If I could just skip the second part and tell the FRITZ!Box to just resolve printserver.example.com instead of printserver.fritz.box - that’d be nice. Maybe I should do another try with a DHCP server soon.

  • philpo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Omada APs, various versions. Really happy with them, their WiFi is great and unlike Ubiquity they also work without the controller as independent devices.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Last I tried a ubiquity AP (2019 or 2020) It could operate independently of a controller with limited features.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I love that GL.iNet stuff ships with OpenWRT (or apparently FreeRTOS in the case of the Thread border router I’m eyeing right now), but I wish they would make stuff like ceiling or wall-mounted PoE access points and rack-mountable wired routers. The form-factor is what stops me from choosing them over TP-Link devices that I have to flash OpenWRT onto myself.

    • SpazOut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I moved to Rukus from Unifi and the difference is night and day. Unifi does not play nice with Sonos and the firmware is rock solid compared to Unifi.

    • Ydh@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Is Ruckus not crazy expensive? We used it for customers and they are like €500 an access point.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Used on eBay and flashed with the Unleashed firmware. It’s the same price range as Ubiquiti stuff.

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    2nd hand Ruckus.

    They’re decent quality that you’d see in a commercial / enterprise setting (so PoE), but Ruckus also have their “Unleashed” firmware which removes the need for a WLC.

    I have 2 in a mesh at home and easily support many IoT devices, phones, laptops, etc on multiple SSIDs

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I used to use R7800s. Then switched to UAP AC Pro / U6 Pro. Today just tested the OpenWrt One.

    • The R7800 (on OpenWrt) is superb, fast, reliable. Can’t say anything bad about it. One of the most successful wireless platforms I’ve used. Probably the best implementation of this chipset too.
    • The UAP AC Pro / U6 Pro perform better than the R7800. They have significantly better radio performance. The range is longer, coverage is uniform, performance is more consistent within the covered area. Adding a local Unifi controller (can be done in Docker) adds some nice wireless and management features like band steering. They don’t work well for bridging / mesh though. I had to run a bridge at some point and a set of Unifi had significant latency spikes, making it bad for gaming and other low-latency applications. A R7800-to-R7800 wireless bridge in the same application was superb with consistently low latency. Unifi can be had for cheaper second hand. Lots of corpos have them and old units get dumped upon upgrades.
    • The OpenWrt One, through my very limited testing shows great performance in good radio conditions. Once you put some obstacles for the signal, performance degrades much quicker than Unifi U6 Pro. In a particular test where the Unifi achieved 50Mbps, the OpenWrt One did 1.5Mbps. I haven’t compared it to an R7800. I don’t know if it would perform any better with different antennas.

    Before that I’ve used R7000, WZR-300HP, WL-500g, WRT54G/L, among others, but none of these are relevant today. :D

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Warning about Unifi and mesh. I’ve done mesh using AC Pro, U6 Pro, AC LR. Any combination produces significant latency spikes that I couldn’t resolve no matter what. Support forums have reports of this problem too without an obvious solution. Maybe the U6 Mesh doesn’t suffer from this. Or maybe you haven’t noticed because you don’t have a sensitive workload. Either way, based on my anecdote, I’d caution against doing mesh with Unifi.

      • randombullet@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        You know, I’ve always attributed it to wifi shenanigans. Never crossed my mind that it was a hardware fault.

        Thankfully in my household I have a rule, if it’s not handheld, it’s s wired. So thankful we don’t have much issues with it

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          My guess is it’s software, since some of these devices have different SoCs. Wasn’t a huge problem. If I remember correctly, the latency was going into tens of ms but not hundreds of ms under load. That was significantly worse than an equivalent R7800 bridge (OpenWrt WDS) where latency increases insignificantly, but it isn’t bad enough to notice in most applications but things like FPS games. VoIP doesn’t like latency spikes but I think it needs hundreds of ms to appear as an audible problem.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m using a couple of TP-Link EAP225 ceiling-mounted PoE access points, and one EAP235-wall wall-mounted one, connected to my old TP-Link Archer C7 router (with the antennas disabled) running OpenWRT.

    I’d like to replace the router with something rack-mounted, but haven’t gotten around to it yet.

  • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I have two TP-Link EAP610, one EAP245, and one EAP615-Wall. The Omada controller runs on my home server in an LXC. Three of the units are powered by PoE, and the garage one is meshed in. I needed three in my house because the walls have chicken wire in them which blocks and reflects WiFi. It took some trail and error to get the WAPs in suitable locations. The main one in the basement is under a wall, such that it has line of sight into 5 rooms of the house. I used iPerf to test performance at the edges of each room, until I could get at least 300 Mbit reliably. That was the only way I could ensure that I was getting a direct signal and not a reflection off a wall.