Way, way too many websites. I have to research all of them just to use one? I have choice paralysis! The corporations are right, I shouldn’t be trusted to make decisions for myself, and the internet should be like cable.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    I must be stupid for not realizing a whitelist ISP implementation, I always imagined it would be more like a blacklist.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I thought about it, but immediately dismissed it cause they would lose their entire user base. It would be far too complex to have whitelist based access, as soon as anyone realized how restrictive it is they would bail

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s kind of interesting to think about it in practice because on one hand the number of ISPs is limited in many areas, taking away the competitive choice, but on the other hand the opportunity to pull this stunt has been around for years in places like the USA and nobody has succeeded so far.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s been essentially tried since near the beginning with AOL. Their dialup service required you to have their branded browser (customized Internet Explorer) open to stay connected. On that browser you could only connect to sites in their walled garden whitelist.

          Luckily, you could just minimize their browser and open regular IE or Netscape to bypass it.