[Jurassic_Park_Clever_Girl.gif]

Are we really surprised, at this point?

“Acshually”, yaoi is M/M romance created by women, for women. If you want to designate a gay male couple, the word is “bara”.

Batshit crazy pot, meet disturbingly fucked up kettle.

Stonewall was a riot.

Happy fury month, comrades.

Also, fuck corpo pride.

Nah, I’d just leave. If the “loved one” decided to cheat, then there wasn’t a relationship in the first place. Wish them well, grieve the relationship, go back to your own life adventure.

Unless there are kids and a mortgage or something. Then, things get complicated. But the breach in trust is unfixable, so the relationship is dead anyway.

Pokemon.

Yup, I’ve read up on it and apparently she erased said tweet. Surely she did it because she realized it would end up badly

Because of the repetitive pattern of sham/shallow accusations which goal is only to give the collaborationist media more material for constant defamation (on her, but also on every leftist voice speaking against the genocide in Gaza and such, which is immediately tagged as “antisemitism” for easy silencing -it’s a globally used strategy, so nothing unfamiliar here, you’ve probably seen it used against many people who are raising their voice against Israel’s crimes against humanity, or their current expansion war -which they roped the USA into). For instance, she has been summoned by the police for her deleted tweet, and they “found” drugs in her purse, except 1- I won’t believe a person summoned to an appointment with the police can be stupid enough to BRING DRUGS in their purse (it was later denied by her lawyer anyway). 2- The info was leaked to collaborationist medias DURING the police custody, which is supposedly both impossible and illegal UNLESS the police themselves leaked something for the medias to gnaw on. And it’s always like that. As for the tweet that got her in “trouble”, it was okay according to international laws (relative to the right of an occupied/subjected to apartheid nation to bear arms to resist the occupant). So, yeah, in France, the collusion of the ultra-rich and far-right media is established, so much so that most people don’t even listen to them anymore. Whatever the country you’re from, the fascists have the same modus operandi, so if you hear corporate media say something and the story is too good to be true, then assume it’s simply no true, especially during war.

French here, I think the information is confirmed. A weird campain is led against this woman, and at that point I’d call it harrassment, especially after the far right ambush set-up that led to the even weirder death of a young neo-nazi militant (the local intelligence had been following them, the police was present and they let the fight happen…), which was blamed on her conference being held nearby.

The Nemesis collective was linked to it as a planner of said ambush that went haywire. That femonationalist collective was endorsed by a former right-wing minister of national security.

I really think it’s a sordid campain to undermine any french voice that would talk about the genocide in Gaza.

… Are we commenting on the same topic? In that case, american republicans

I never said trans porn or watching porn was awful. It’s not about the content, in that case. It’s about the audience.

Yeah, got it from the “I’m suffering, for x, y and z reasons.” “No you’re not, prove it” vibe.

… How can you both understand and not understand at the same time? Are you american?

To sum it up, minorities suffer from the gaze that is cast upon them, especially if this gaze is exploitative, degrading, objectifying and made by and for the pleasure of the oppressor, thus reinforcing the oppressor’s bias against the minority.

If trans porn is the only way these men are confronted to the existence of trans people, they’d oversexualize the idea of trans, which in turn leads them to blame/despise the trans even more (because of both their conservative views and unhealthy relationship with sex), not even leaving trans people the space to be something else in their eyes than objects to jerk off to (aka “people”).

Man, you can’t just ignore how porn molds the way people see others and what they expect of them, be it men, women or trans people

I don’t think that you being you qualifies as immunity from slander responsibilities. Reddit seems to suck, of course, but saying something about someone without proof, however terrible that person is, is slander.

I am gay myself and couldn’t give a single fuck about that man’s sexual orientation and kinks. I do care about the fact that he’s a cold-blooded assassin who’s place is in jail, though.